Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Demonstrate I/O in File examples #108094

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 16, 2023
Merged

Demonstrate I/O in File examples #108094

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 16, 2023

Conversation

kornelski
Copy link
Contributor

I've noticed that some Rust novices unnecessarily reinvent std::fs::{read,write}, presumably because they search for equivalents of fopen + fwrite. I've added links to std::fs::{read,write} in the docs.

The File examples were only showing how to open a file, but not how to use the opened handle, unnecessarily leaving out the next step. I've added a variety of different uses of file handles to their examples in docs.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 15, 2023

r? @cuviper

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 15, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 15, 2023

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@cuviper
Copy link
Member

cuviper commented Feb 15, 2023

LGTM!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 15, 2023

📌 Commit 4c2d48e has been approved by cuviper

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 15, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#107034 (Migrating rustc_infer to session diagnostics (part 4))
 - rust-lang#107972 (Fix unintentional UB in ui tests)
 - rust-lang#108010 (Make `InferCtxt::can_eq` and `InferCtxt::can_sub` return booleans)
 - rust-lang#108021 (make x look for x.py if shell script does not exist)
 - rust-lang#108047 (Use `target` instead of `machine` for mir interpreter integer handling.)
 - rust-lang#108049 (Don't suggest `#[doc(hidden)]` trait methods with matching return type)
 - rust-lang#108066 (Better names for illegal impl trait positions)
 - rust-lang#108076 (rustdoc: Use more let chain)
 - rust-lang#108088 (clarify correctness of `black_box`)
 - rust-lang#108094 (Demonstrate I/O in File examples)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 5547101 into rust-lang:master Feb 16, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.69.0 milestone Feb 16, 2023
@kornelski kornelski deleted the fsdocs branch February 16, 2023 13:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants