rustdoc: use a template to generate Hrefs #109616
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @notriddle (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
Some changes occurred in src/librustdoc/clean/types.rs cc @camelid |
jsha
force-pushed
the
href-template
branch
2 times, most recently
from
3365c0c
to
fb5a92a
Compare
|
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-perf
|
⌛ Trying commit fb5a92a9576a41666183124a42a066464ee53e78 with merge ec9ce33518e7a69ce272577490eb0cff0c04247c... |
|
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
1 similar comment
|
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Finished benchmarking commit (ec9ce33518e7a69ce272577490eb0cff0c04247c): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDEDBenchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @bors rollup=never Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
|
rustbot
added
perf-regression
camelid
reviewed
Mar 30, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm, based on the perf results, it seems like using templates for this might not be worth it. I agree that the existing code is not great both for perf and readability reasons though.
I think what could potentially help on both fronts is collecting all the data for the href using structured types (rather than passing strings around). Then we could have a relatively simple formatting function that would take that data and generate the href. What do you think?
|
The structured types approach is pretty much what this PR does. The Href struct is: struct Href<'a, P>
where
P: fmt::Display,
{
root: &'a str,
parent_directories: ParentDirectories,
path_components: P,
filename_prefix: &'a str,
filename_base: Cow<'a, str>,
fragment: &'a str,
}And in terms of performance of the templates, askama just generates a series of I've been trying to get rustc-perf benchmarking set up locally so I can test various hypotheses and see where the issue is. For instance in a few places I replaced At any rate, I'm having trouble with rustc-perf right now because when I run the doc benchmarks locally, it fails to build stm32f4 (and several other crates), seemingly because of a build script that can't determine the rust version based on my local binary. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
jsha
force-pushed
the
href-template
branch
2 times, most recently
from
44c43ae
to
98c4065
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-perf
|
⌛ Trying commit ecfcd356b45c366206b69a84b508fc72fa0d3661 with merge ee1012a52be4db4a2dcf676b195c25a83089aaa0... |
|
(pushed an update to resolve a merge conflict. no substantive changes) |
|
@bors r+ rollup=never |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
⌛ Testing commit ae1a1ef with merge db3c527cbfab37706414b16370b660c11c7ed6ae... |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
aliemjay
added a commit
to aliemjay/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2023
rustdoc: use a template to generate Hrefs Previously, href always returned a string, so each link incurred at least one allocation. We were also using `"../".repeat()`, and `.collect()` into strings to generate part of the paths. This abstracts away those repetitions into a couple of helper structs, ParentDirectories and PathComponents, and puts them together into an `Href` template, which should save some allocations. As a side benefit, I think it makes the logic of constructing links a little clearer. This removes the only call sites for certain methods of UrlPartsBuilder, so it also removes those methods. Also, remove the ItemType return value from `href` and friends; it was basically unused. Part of rust-lang#108868
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #111358) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
|
🔒 Merge conflict This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again. How do I rebase?Assuming
You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial. Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Error message |
|
🔒 Merge conflict This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again. How do I rebase?Assuming
You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial. Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Error message |
|
🔒 Merge conflict This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again. How do I rebase?Assuming
You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial. Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Error message |
|
🔒 Merge conflict This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again. How do I rebase?Assuming
You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial. Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Error message |
|
@jsha any updates on this? |
|
🔒 Merge conflict This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again. How do I rebase?Assuming
You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial. Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Error message |
|
🔒 Merge conflict This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again. How do I rebase?Assuming
You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial. Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Error message |
|
(I had to synchronize the queue) |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
|
Closing this as inactive. Feel free to reöpen this pr or create a new pr if you get the time to work on this. Thanks |
Dylan-DPC
added
S-inactive
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, href always returned a string, so each link incurred at least one allocation. We were also using
"../".repeat(), and.collect()into strings to generate part of the paths. This abstracts away those repetitions into a couple of helper structs, ParentDirectories and PathComponents, and puts them together into anHreftemplate, which should save some allocations. As a side benefit, I think it makes the logic of constructing links a little clearer.This removes the only call sites for certain methods of UrlPartsBuilder, so it also removes those methods.
Also, remove the ItemType return value from
hrefand friends; it was basically unused.Part of #108868