[Experiment] Remove format_args_nl!() #111060
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
m-ou-se
added
T-libs
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
m-ou-se
removed
the
S-waiting-on-review
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-perf
|
⌛ Trying commit b1745d5 with merge a8fce3207e7c6d0c3b2d694f9f90b11ad23232d8... |
|
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Finished benchmarking commit (a8fce3207e7c6d0c3b2d694f9f90b11ad23232d8): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action neededBenchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Bootstrap: 656.574s -> 656.514s (-0.01%) |
rustbot
removed
the
S-waiting-on-perf
|
Huh. Okay, that's cool. |
|
Closing this as it was an experiment. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This experiment removes
format_args_nl!(…), replacing it withformat_args!("{}\n", format_args!(…)).This will result in a performance regression, but I'm curious how significant it is.Edit: No performance impact, actually!(This does break a bunch of diagnostics and (clippy) lints, so this is not mergable.)