Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate item_static to Askama #111927

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 27, 2023
Merged

Migrate item_static to Askama #111927

merged 4 commits into from
May 27, 2023

Conversation

sladyn98
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request addresses the type signature of the item_static function in our codebase. Previously, this function accepted a mutable reference to a Buffer for writing output. The current changes modify this to instead accept a mutable reference to any type that implements the Write trait.

Referes #108868

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 25, 2023

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @jsha (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 25, 2023
@sladyn98
Copy link
Contributor Author

CC @GuillaumeGomez. This is my first contribution so I am trying to learn, do let me know if I am heading in the right direction.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Apart from the CI error, looks great to me, thanks!

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@sladyn98
Copy link
Contributor Author

@GuillaumeGomez I fixed the CI. Would love a review. Thanks in advance

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 26, 2023

📌 Commit aa67ae2 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 26, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 26, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#111714 (Stop confusing specification levels when computing expectations.)
 - rust-lang#111927 (Migrate `item_static` to Askama)
 - rust-lang#111954 (improve error message for calling a method on a raw pointer with an unknown pointee)
 - rust-lang#111973 (Update current implementation comments for `select_nth_unstable`)
 - rust-lang#111976 (Generate docs for bootstrap itself)
 - rust-lang#111977 (Make errors from `x doc` less verbose)
 - rust-lang#111987 (do not prefer substs relate during coherence)
 - rust-lang#111991 (Change ty and const error's pretty printing to be in braces)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 1e766bf into rust-lang:master May 27, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.71.0 milestone May 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants