-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Don't typecheck recovered method call from suggestion #112100
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Only make the use-dot-operator-to-call-method suggestion, but do not double down and use the recovered type to perform method call typechecking as it will produce confusing diagnostics on the "fixed" code.
r? @oli-obk (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
May 30, 2023
oof yea, that makes sense! @bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
May 30, 2023
Noratrieb
added a commit
to Noratrieb/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2023
Don't typecheck recovered method call from suggestion Only make the use-dot-operator-to-call-method suggestion, but do not double down and use the recovered type to perform method call typechecking as it will produce confusing diagnostics relevant for the *fixed* code. ### Code Sample ```rust struct Client; impl Client { fn post<T: std::ops::Add>(&self, _: T, _: T) {} } fn f() { let c = Client; post(c, ()); } ``` ### Before This PR ``` error[[E0277]](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/error_codes/E0277.html): cannot add `()` to `()` --> src/lib.rs:9:5 | 9 | post(c, ()); | ^^^^^^^^^^^ no implementation for `() + ()` | = help: the trait `Add` is not implemented for `()` note: required by a bound in `Client::post` --> src/lib.rs:4:16 | 4 | fn post<T: std::ops::Add>(&self, _: T, _: T) {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `Client::post` error[[E0061]](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/error_codes/E0061.html): this function takes 2 arguments but 1 argument was supplied --> src/lib.rs:9:5 | 9 | post(c, ()); | ^^^^ an argument of type `()` is missing | note: method defined here --> src/lib.rs:4:8 | 4 | fn post<T: std::ops::Add>(&self, _: T, _: T) {} | ^^^^ ----- ---- ---- help: provide the argument | 9 | post((), ())(c, ()); | ++++++++ error[[E0425]](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/error_codes/E0425.html): cannot find function `post` in this scope --> src/lib.rs:9:5 | 9 | post(c, ()); | ^^^^ not found in this scope | help: use the `.` operator to call the method `post` on `&Client` | 9 - post(c, ()); 9 + c.post(()); | Some errors have detailed explanations: E0061, E0277, E0425. For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0061`. ``` ### After This PR ``` error[E0425]: cannot find function `post` in this scope --> tests/ui/typeck/issue-106929.rs:9:5 | 9 | post(c, ()); | ^^^^ not found in this scope | help: use the `.` operator to call the method `post` on `&Client` | 9 - post(c, ()); 9 + c.post(()); | error: aborting due to previous error For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0425`. ``` Fixes rust-lang#106929.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2023
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#107916 (fix comment on Allocator trait) - rust-lang#111543 (Uplift `clippy::invalid_utf8_in_unchecked` lint) - rust-lang#111872 (fix: dedup `static_candidates` before report) - rust-lang#111955 (bootstrap: Various Step refactors) - rust-lang#112060 (`EarlyBinder::new` -> `EarlyBinder::bind`) - rust-lang#112064 (Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format) - rust-lang#112100 (Don't typecheck recovered method call from suggestion) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Only make the use-dot-operator-to-call-method suggestion, but do not double down and use the recovered type to perform method call typechecking as it will produce confusing diagnostics relevant for the fixed code.
Code Sample
Before This PR
After This PR
Fixes #106929.