-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Treat TAIT equation as always ambiguous in coherence #112780
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
r? @davidtwco (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Jun 18, 2023
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
compiler-errors
force-pushed
the
tait-is-ambig
branch
from
June 18, 2023 22:53
accebc7
to
d43683f
Compare
Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy cc @rust-lang/clippy |
compiler-errors
commented
Jun 18, 2023
@@ -32,10 +32,4 @@ impl Into<u8> for ContainsVal { | |||
} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
type Opaque = impl Sized; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed this example because it shouldn't pass coherence.
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jun 19, 2023
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2023
Treat TAIT equation as always ambiguous in coherence Not sure why we weren't treating all TAIT equality as ambiguous -- this behavior combined with `DefineOpaqueTypes::No` leads to coherence overlap failures, since we incorrectly consider impls as not overlapping because the obligation `T: From<Foo>` doesn't hold. Fixes rust-lang#112765
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#109970 ([doc] `poll_fn`: explain how to `pin` captured state safely) - rust-lang#112705 (Simplify `Span::source_callee` impl) - rust-lang#112757 (Use BorrowFlag instead of explicit isize) - rust-lang#112768 (Rewrite various resolve/diagnostics errors as translatable diagnostics) - rust-lang#112777 (Continue folding in query normalizer on weak aliases) - rust-lang#112780 (Treat TAIT equation as always ambiguous in coherence) - rust-lang#112783 (Don't ICE on bound var in `reject_fn_ptr_impls`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Not sure why we weren't treating all TAIT equality as ambiguous -- this behavior combined with
DefineOpaqueTypes::No
leads to coherence overlap failures, since we incorrectly consider impls as not overlapping because the obligationT: From<Foo>
doesn't hold.Fixes #112765