Ensure sanity of all computed ABIs #117500
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @oli-obk (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
RalfJung
force-pushed
the
aggregate-abi
branch
2 times, most recently
from
94200f6 to
487853e
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
RalfJung
force-pushed
the
aggregate-abi
branch
from
487853e to
937ed6d
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
RalfJung
force-pushed
the
aggregate-abi
branch
from
937ed6d to
e2b134d
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Oli is on vacation. |
RalfJung
force-pushed
the
aggregate-abi
branch
from
7f0545c to
1f5480d
Compare
RalfJung
force-pushed
the
aggregate-abi
branch
from
1f5480d to
0865a2e
Compare
|
It's better to reroll r? compiler |
davidtwco
approved these changes
Nov 19, 2023
|
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2023
Ensure sanity of all computed ABIs This moves the ABI sanity assertions from the codegen backend to the ABI computation logic. Sadly, due to past mistakes, we [have to](rust-lang#117351 (comment)) be able to compute a sane ABI for nonsensical function types like `extern "C" fn(str) -> str`. So to make the sanity check pass we first need to make all ABI adjustment deal with unsized types... and we have no shared infrastructure for those adjustments, so that's a bunch of copy-paste. At least we have assertions failing loudly when one accidentally sets a different mode for an unsized argument. To achieve this, this re-lands the parts of rust-lang#80594 that got reverted in rust-lang#81388. To avoid breaking wasm ABI again, that ABI now explicitly opts-in to the (wrong, broken) ABI that we currently keep for backwards compatibility. That's still better than having *every* ABI use the wrong broken default! Cc `@bjorn3` Fixes rust-lang#115845
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
Ah, that's annoying... we are currently computing things like the |
|
Ah no I can easily fix that by changing |
|
@bors r=davidtwco |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
@bors rollup=iffy |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (d19980e): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 677.922s -> 675.906s (-0.30%) |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2023
…errors the unadjusted ABI needs to pass aggregates by-value Fixes rust-lang#118124, a regression introduced in rust-lang#117500
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/miri
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 27, 2023
the unadjusted ABI needs to pass aggregates by-value Fixes rust-lang/rust#118124, a regression introduced in rust-lang/rust#117500
This was referenced May 29, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This moves the ABI sanity assertions from the codegen backend to the ABI computation logic. Sadly, due to past mistakes, we have to be able to compute a sane ABI for nonsensical function types like
extern "C" fn(str) -> str. So to make the sanity check pass we first need to make all ABI adjustment deal with unsized types... and we have no shared infrastructure for those adjustments, so that's a bunch of copy-paste. At least we have assertions failing loudly when one accidentally sets a different mode for an unsized argument.To achieve this, this re-lands the parts of #80594 that got reverted in #81388. To avoid breaking wasm ABI again, that ABI now explicitly opts-in to the (wrong, broken) ABI that we currently keep for backwards compatibility. That's still better than having every ABI use the wrong broken default!
Cc @bjorn3
Fixes #115845