-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes error count display is different when there's only one error left #118138
Conversation
Could not assign reviewer from: |
(waffle told me that it is ready to review this now) |
@bors r+ rollup p=10 let's pray to ferris everything goes smoothly 🙏 |
@bors rollup=never 🤣 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@bors r- |
7466811
to
ae7157d
Compare
The Miri subtree was changed cc @rust-lang/miri Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy cc @rust-lang/clippy |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
ae7157d
to
10d241a
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I blessed it some more 🙏 |
…leLapkin Fixes error count display is different when there's only one error left Supersedes rust-lang#114759 ### What did I do? I did the small change in `rustc_errors` by hand. Then I did the other changes in `/compiler` by hand, those were just find replace on `*.rs` in the workspace. The changes in run-make are find replace for `run-make` in the workspace. All other changes are blessed using `x test TEST --bless`. I blessed the tests that were blessed in rust-lang#114759. ### how to review this nightmare ping bors with an `r+`. You should check that my logic is sound and maybe quickly scroll through the diff, but fully verifying it seems fairly hard to impossible. I did my best to do this correctly. Thank you `@adrianEffe` for bringing this up and your initial implementation. cc `@flip1995,` you said you want to do a subtree sync asap cc `@RalfJung` maybe you want to do a quick subtree sync afterwards as well for Miri r? `@WaffleLapkin`
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@bors r- |
We have to ignore some tests in stage1.
@bors r=WaffleLapkin p=15 |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (37b2813): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 675.167s -> 676.226s (0.16%) |
Changes required due to: - rust-lang/rust#118256 - rust-lang/rust#118138
…monster-mess, r=WaffleLapkin Remove ignore-stage1 that was added when changing error count msg The bootstrap bump has happened, so the bootstrap compiler now contains the new diagnostic. this was added in rust-lang#118138
Rollup merge of rust-lang#119655 - Nilstrieb:cleanup-the-error-count-monster-mess, r=WaffleLapkin Remove ignore-stage1 that was added when changing error count msg The bootstrap bump has happened, so the bootstrap compiler now contains the new diagnostic. this was added in rust-lang#118138
Supersedes #114759
What did I do?
I did the small change in
rustc_errors
by hand. Then I did the other changes in/compiler
by hand, those were just find replace on*.rs
in the workspace. The changes in run-make are find replace forrun-make
in the workspace.All other changes are blessed using
x test TEST --bless
. I blessed the tests that were blessed in #114759.how to review this nightmare
ping bors with an
r+
. You should check that my logic is sound and maybe quickly scroll through the diff, but fully verifying it seems fairly hard to impossible. I did my best to do this correctly.Thank you @adrianEffe for bringing this up and your initial implementation.
cc @flip1995, you said you want to do a subtree sync asap
cc @RalfJung maybe you want to do a quick subtree sync afterwards as well for Miri
r? @WaffleLapkin