Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

merge core_panic feature into panic_internals #118781

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 6, 2024

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

@RalfJung RalfJung commented Dec 9, 2023

I don't know why those are two separate features, but it does not seem intentional. This merge is useful because with #118123, panic_internals is recognized as an internal feature, but core_panic is not -- but core_panic definitely should be internal.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 9, 2023

r? @joshtriplett

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 9, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

r? libs

@rustbot rustbot assigned thomcc and unassigned joshtriplett Dec 19, 2023
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

RalfJung commented Jan 6, 2024

@rust-lang/libs this shouldn't be a hard PR to review, just reorganizing some perma-unstable features. Would be great if someone could take a look. :)

@the8472
Copy link
Member

the8472 commented Jan 6, 2024

looks fine, the feature was listed as "never stabilize" in #26868 (comment)

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 6, 2024

📌 Commit af4913f has been approved by the8472

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 6, 2024
@the8472 the8472 assigned the8472 and unassigned thomcc Jan 6, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#118194 (rustdoc: search for tuples and unit by type with `()`)
 - rust-lang#118781 (merge core_panic feature into panic_internals)
 - rust-lang#119486 (pass allow-{dirty,staged} to clippy)
 - rust-lang#119591 (rustc_mir_transform: Make DestinationPropagation stable for queries)
 - rust-lang#119595 (Fixed ambiguity in hint.rs)
 - rust-lang#119624 (rustc_span: More consistent span combination operations)
 - rust-lang#119653 (compiler: update Fuchsia sanitizer support.)
 - rust-lang#119655 (Remove ignore-stage1 that was added when changing error count msg)
 - rust-lang#119661 (Strip lld-wrapper binaries)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 923578e into rust-lang:master Jan 6, 2024
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.77.0 milestone Jan 6, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#118781 - RalfJung:core-panic-feature, r=the8472

merge core_panic feature into panic_internals

I don't know why those are two separate features, but it does not seem intentional. This merge is useful because with rust-lang#118123, panic_internals is recognized as an internal feature, but core_panic is not -- but core_panic definitely should be internal.
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the core-panic-feature branch January 7, 2024 16:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants