-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove various has_errors
or err_count
uses
#120342
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f68741b
Stop checking `err_count` in macro_rules validity checking
oli-obk f6f0e04
Remove an unused error count check
oli-obk 646c8fc
Statically ensure an error is reported in report_arg_errors
oli-obk 2b60e56
Statically ensure report_selection_error actually reports an error
oli-obk 3042da0
Remove has_errors check in builtin macro parsing
oli-obk 054e1e3
Track ErrorGuaranteed instead of conjuring it from thin air
oli-obk File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems unconnected with the second half of this commit. Is it necessary?
Also, if necessary, it seems incomplete, because there are two other emit calls in this function. Seems like they should be converted to return created errors as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The others return. this one doesn't
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see one
err.emit()
and twoemit_err()
calls inparse_args
. Prior to this change, none of them returned. After this change, one of them returns anErr
without emitting, and the other two are unchanged.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh hmm. Need to rethink this one
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The reason I did this is so that expand_format_args_impl (which is the only
parse_args
caller), doesn't cause follow-up warnings likewhich are a bit nonsensical considering we already got a
and the fact that the diagnostic is likely always wrong. So I opted to just make the entire macro expansion go to a
DummyResult::any
if there were errors during it. This is already done for other errors, so...There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm now not clear if you're intending to do more work here ("need to rethink this one") or if you are waiting for a response from me. Can you clarify?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are no changes needed. this early return ensures that the macro expansion is poisoned instead of expanding to nonsense that may cause follow up nonsensical diagnostics.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Basically I think we should merge it as is, but I can also remove the entire commit and file it as a separate PR if you prefer
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I'll accept that explanation, thanks.