Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mark a doctest with UB as no_run #120366

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2024

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

#119911 added a doctest with UB. That one shouldn't be run, or else Miri will complain.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 26, 2024

r? @cuviper

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 26, 2024
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

compiler-errors commented Jan 26, 2024

How is this test UB? If the test is UB, should we just remove it, or fix it?

edit: lmao, nvm, I read the whole thing. Yeah, seems like an oversight in the PR to add no_run here.

@cuviper
Copy link
Member

cuviper commented Jan 26, 2024

The example is intentionally demonstrating, "don't do this because it's UB!"

@cuviper
Copy link
Member

cuviper commented Jan 26, 2024

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 26, 2024

📌 Commit 5dd6418 has been approved by cuviper

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 26, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 12 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#103522 (stabilise array methods)
 - rust-lang#113489 (impl `From<&[T; N]>` for `Cow<[T]>`)
 - rust-lang#119342 (Emit suggestion when trying to write exclusive ranges as `..<`)
 - rust-lang#119562 (Rename `pointer` field on `Pin`)
 - rust-lang#119800 (Document `rustc_index::vec::IndexVec`)
 - rust-lang#120205 (std: make `HEAP` initializer never inline)
 - rust-lang#120277 (Normalize field types before checking validity)
 - rust-lang#120311 (core: add `From<core::ascii::Char>` implementations)
 - rust-lang#120366 (mark a doctest with UB as no_run)
 - rust-lang#120378 (always normalize `LoweredTy` in the new solver)
 - rust-lang#120382 (Classify closure arguments in refutable pattern in argument error)
 - rust-lang#120389 (Add fmease to the compiler review rotation)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit a7f5bde into rust-lang:master Jan 27, 2024
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.77.0 milestone Jan 27, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120366 - RalfJung:is_val_statically_known, r=cuviper

mark a doctest with UB as no_run

rust-lang#119911 added a doctest with UB. That one shouldn't be run, or else Miri will complain.
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the is_val_statically_known branch January 27, 2024 11:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants