-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 9 pull requests #120824
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 9 pull requests #120824
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Return with a question mark was triggered in situations where the `?` desuraging was performing error conversion via `Into`/`From`. The desugared `?` produces a match over an expression with type `std::ops::ControlFlow<B,C>` with `B:Result<Infallible, E:Error>` and `C:Result<_, E':Error>`, and the arms perform the conversion. The patch adds another check in the lint that checks that `E == E'`. If `E == E'`, then the `?` is indeed unnecessary. changelog: False Positive: `needless_return_with_question_mark` when implicit Error Conversion occurs.
… lint emit warning
There are cases where the closure call is needed in some macros, this in particular occurs when the closure has parameters. To handle this case, we allow the lint when there are no parameters in the closure, or the closure is outside a macro invocation. fixes: rust-lang#11274, rust-lang#1553 changelog: FP: [`redundant_closure_call`] when closures with parameters are passed in macros.
`unescape_literal` becomes `unescape_unicode`, and `unescape_c_string` becomes `unescape_mixed`. Because rfc3349 will mean that C string literals will no longer be the only mixed utf8 literals.
Add lint configuration for `modulo_arithmetic` Collect meta-data
remove StructuralEq trait The documentation given for the trait is outdated: *all* function pointers implement `PartialEq` and `Eq` these days. So the `StructuralEq` trait doesn't really seem to have any reason to exist any more. One side-effect of this PR is that we allow matching on some consts that do not implement `Eq`. However, we already allowed matching on floats and consts containing floats, so this is not new, it is just allowed in more cases now. IMO it makes no sense at all to allow float matching but also sometimes require an `Eq` instance. If we want to require `Eq` we should adjust rust-lang#115893 to check for `Eq`, and rule out float matching for good. Fixes rust-lang#115881
Avoid linting redundant closure when callee is marked `#[track_caller]` Fixes rust-lang#12199 Not sure if there's a nicer way to detect functions marked `#[track_caller]` other than by just looking at its attributes 🤔 changelog: [`redundant_closure`]: [`redundant_closure_for_method_calls`]: avoid linting closures where the function being called is marked `#[track_caller]`
Co-authored-by: y21 <30553356+y21@users.noreply.github.com>
…lyxyas Warn if an item coming from more recent version than MSRV is used Part of rust-lang/rust-clippy#6324. ~~Currently, the lint is not working for the simple reason that the `stable` attribute is not kept in dependencies. I'll send a PR to rustc to see if they'd be okay with keeping it.~~ EDIT: There was actually a `lookup_stability` function providing this information, so all good now! cc `@epage` changelog: create new [`incompatible_msrv`] lint
…1-dead RFC 3349 precursors Some cleanups I found while working on RFC 3349 that are worth landing separately. r? `@fee1-dead`
…Manishearth Clippy subtree update r? `@Manishearth` Closes rust-lang/rust-clippy#12148
…ou-se core/time: avoid divisions in Duration::new In our (decently large) code base, we use `SystemTime::UNIX_EPOCH.elapsed()` in a lot of places & often in a loop or in the hot path. On [Unix](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.75.0/library/std/src/sys/unix/time.rs#L153-L162) at least, it seems we do calculations before hand to ensure that nanos is within the valid range, yet `Duration::new()` still checks it again, using 2 divisions. It seems like adding a branch can make this function 33% faster on ARM64 in the cases where nanos is already in the valid range & seems to have no effect in the other case. Benchmarks: M1 Pro (14-inch base model): ``` duration/current/checked time: [1.5945 ns 1.6167 ns 1.6407 ns] Found 5 outliers among 100 measurements (5.00%) 2 (2.00%) high mild 3 (3.00%) high severe duration/current/unchecked time: [1.5941 ns 1.6051 ns 1.6179 ns] Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%) 1 (1.00%) high mild 1 (1.00%) high severe duration/branched/checked time: [1.1997 ns 1.2048 ns 1.2104 ns] Found 8 outliers among 100 measurements (8.00%) 4 (4.00%) high mild 4 (4.00%) high severe duration/branched/unchecked time: [1.5881 ns 1.5957 ns 1.6039 ns] Found 6 outliers among 100 measurements (6.00%) 3 (3.00%) high mild 3 (3.00%) high severe ``` EC2 c7gd.16xlarge (Graviton 3): ``` duration/current/checked time: [2.7996 ns 2.8000 ns 2.8003 ns] Found 5 outliers among 100 measurements (5.00%) 2 (2.00%) low severe 3 (3.00%) low mild duration/current/unchecked time: [2.9922 ns 2.9925 ns 2.9928 ns] Found 7 outliers among 100 measurements (7.00%) 4 (4.00%) low severe 1 (1.00%) low mild 2 (2.00%) high mild duration/branched/checked time: [2.0830 ns 2.0843 ns 2.0857 ns] Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%) 1 (1.00%) low severe 1 (1.00%) low mild 1 (1.00%) high mild duration/branched/unchecked time: [2.9879 ns 2.9886 ns 2.9893 ns] Found 5 outliers among 100 measurements (5.00%) 3 (3.00%) low severe 2 (2.00%) low mild ``` EC2 r7iz.16xlarge (Intel Xeon Scalable-based (Sapphire Rapids)): ``` duration/current/checked time: [980.60 ps 980.79 ps 980.99 ps] Found 10 outliers among 100 measurements (10.00%) 4 (4.00%) low severe 2 (2.00%) low mild 3 (3.00%) high mild 1 (1.00%) high severe duration/current/unchecked time: [979.53 ps 979.74 ps 979.96 ps] Found 6 outliers among 100 measurements (6.00%) 2 (2.00%) low severe 1 (1.00%) low mild 2 (2.00%) high mild 1 (1.00%) high severe duration/branched/checked time: [938.72 ps 938.96 ps 939.22 ps] Found 4 outliers among 100 measurements (4.00%) 1 (1.00%) low mild 1 (1.00%) high mild 2 (2.00%) high severe duration/branched/unchecked time: [1.0103 ns 1.0110 ns 1.0118 ns] Found 10 outliers among 100 measurements (10.00%) 2 (2.00%) low mild 7 (7.00%) high mild 1 (1.00%) high severe ``` Bench code (ran using stable 1.75.0 & criterion latest 0.5.1): I couldn't find any benches for `Duration` in this repo, so I just copied the relevant types & recreated it. ```rust use criterion::{black_box, criterion_group, criterion_main, Criterion}; pub fn duration_bench(c: &mut Criterion) { const NANOS_PER_SEC: u32 = 1_000_000_000; #[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord, Hash)] #[repr(transparent)] struct Nanoseconds(u32); impl Default for Nanoseconds { #[inline] fn default() -> Self { // SAFETY: 0 is within the valid range unsafe { Nanoseconds(0) } } } #[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord, Hash, Default)] pub struct Duration { secs: u64, nanos: Nanoseconds, // Always 0 <= nanos < NANOS_PER_SEC } impl Duration { #[inline] pub const fn new_current(secs: u64, nanos: u32) -> Duration { let secs = match secs.checked_add((nanos / NANOS_PER_SEC) as u64) { Some(secs) => secs, None => panic!("overflow in Duration::new"), }; let nanos = nanos % NANOS_PER_SEC; // SAFETY: nanos % NANOS_PER_SEC < NANOS_PER_SEC, therefore nanos is within the valid range Duration { secs, nanos: unsafe { Nanoseconds(nanos) } } } #[inline] pub const fn new_branched(secs: u64, nanos: u32) -> Duration { if nanos < NANOS_PER_SEC { // SAFETY: nanos < NANOS_PER_SEC, therefore nanos is within the valid range Duration { secs, nanos: unsafe { Nanoseconds(nanos) } } } else { let secs = match secs.checked_add((nanos / NANOS_PER_SEC) as u64) { Some(secs) => secs, None => panic!("overflow in Duration::new"), }; let nanos = nanos % NANOS_PER_SEC; // SAFETY: nanos % NANOS_PER_SEC < NANOS_PER_SEC, therefore nanos is within the valid range Duration { secs, nanos: unsafe { Nanoseconds(nanos) } } } } } let mut group = c.benchmark_group("duration/current"); group.bench_function("checked", |b| { b.iter(|| black_box(Duration::new_current(black_box(1_000_000_000), black_box(1_000_000)))); }); group.bench_function("unchecked", |b| { b.iter(|| { black_box(Duration::new_current(black_box(1_000_000_000), black_box(2_000_000_000))) }); }); drop(group); let mut group = c.benchmark_group("duration/branched"); group.bench_function("checked", |b| { b.iter(|| { black_box(Duration::new_branched(black_box(1_000_000_000), black_box(1_000_000))) }); }); group.bench_function("unchecked", |b| { b.iter(|| { black_box(Duration::new_branched(black_box(1_000_000_000), black_box(2_000_000_000))) }); }); } criterion_group!(duration_benches, duration_bench); criterion_main!(duration_benches); ```
std::thread::available_parallelism merging linux/android/freebsd version FreeBSD 13.1 had introduced a sched cpu affinity compatibility layer with Linux. 13.0 and even 13.1 being EOL, we can simplify here.
…al-link, r=notriddle [rustdoc] Correctly generate path for non-local items in source code pages While browsing some crates using the "jump to def" feature, I realized that a lot of items didn't have a link generated. The reason is because we only cache foreign items if they appear in the documented API. This means that for the others, we need to infer them. r? `@notriddle`
…pages_fbsd, r=m-ou-se std::thread update freebsd stack guard handling. up to now, it had been assumed the stack guard setting default is not touched in the field but some user might just want to disable it or increase it. checking it once at runtime should be enough.
…s, r=davidtwco Invert diagnostic lints. That is, change `diagnostic_outside_of_impl` and `untranslatable_diagnostic` from `allow` to `deny`, because more than half of the compiler has been converted to use translated diagnostics. This commit removes more `deny` attributes than it adds `allow` attributes, which proves that this change is warranted. r? `@davidtwco`
…write, r=compiler-errors A drive-by rewrite of `give_region_a_name()` This drive-by rewrite makes the cache-updating nature of the method clearer, using the Entry API into the hash table for region names to capture the update-insert nature of the method. May be marginally more efficient since it only runtime-borrows and indexes the map once, but in this context the performance impact is almost certainly completely negligible. Note that this commit should preserve all externally visible behaviour. Notably, it preserves the debug logging: 1. printing even in the case of a `None` for the new computed name, and 2. only printing on new values, begin silent on reused values
…Manishearth Clippy subtree update r? `@Manishearth`
…ructors, r=Nilstrieb Use `transmute_unchecked` in `NonZero::new`. Tracking issue: rust-lang#120257 See rust-lang#120521 (comment).
…=oli-obk Fix more `ty::Error` ICEs in MIR passes Fixes rust-lang#120791 - Add a check for `ty::Error` in the `ByMove` coroutine pass Fixes rust-lang#120816 - Add a check for `ty::Error` in the MIR validator Also a drive-by fix for a FIXME I had asked oli to add r? oli-obk
rustbot
added
A-query-system
Area: The rustc query system (https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/query.html)
A-translation
Area: Translation infrastructure, and migrating existing diagnostics to SessionDiagnostic
O-unix
Operating system: Unix-like
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Feb 9, 2024
@bors r+ rollup=never p=9 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Feb 9, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#120308 (core/time: avoid divisions in Duration::new) - rust-lang#120589 (std::thread::available_parallelism merging linux/android/freebsd version) - rust-lang#120596 ([rustdoc] Correctly generate path for non-local items in source code pages) - rust-lang#120672 (std::thread update freebsd stack guard handling.) - rust-lang#120693 (Invert diagnostic lints.) - rust-lang#120704 (A drive-by rewrite of `give_region_a_name()`) - rust-lang#120806 (Clippy subtree update) - rust-lang#120809 (Use `transmute_unchecked` in `NonZero::new`.) - rust-lang#120817 (Fix more `ty::Error` ICEs in MIR passes) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Feb 9, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-query-system
Area: The rustc query system (https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/query.html)
A-translation
Area: Translation infrastructure, and migrating existing diagnostics to SessionDiagnostic
O-unix
Operating system: Unix-like
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
give_region_a_name()
#120704 (A drive-by rewrite ofgive_region_a_name()
)transmute_unchecked
inNonZero::new
. #120809 (Usetransmute_unchecked
inNonZero::new
.)ty::Error
ICEs in MIR passes #120817 (Fix morety::Error
ICEs in MIR passes)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup