Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove unnecessary calls to commit_if_ok #121002

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
48 changes: 20 additions & 28 deletions compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/at.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -285,13 +285,11 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Trace<'a, 'tcx> {
T: Relate<'tcx>,
{
let Trace { at, trace, a_is_expected } = self;
at.infcx.commit_if_ok(|_| {
let mut fields = at.infcx.combine_fields(trace, at.param_env, define_opaque_types);
fields
.sub(a_is_expected)
.relate(a, b)
.map(move |_| InferOk { value: (), obligations: fields.obligations })
})
let mut fields = at.infcx.combine_fields(trace, at.param_env, define_opaque_types);
fields
.sub(a_is_expected)
.relate(a, b)
.map(move |_| InferOk { value: (), obligations: fields.obligations })
}

/// Makes `a == b`; the expectation is set by the call to
Expand All @@ -302,13 +300,11 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Trace<'a, 'tcx> {
T: Relate<'tcx>,
{
let Trace { at, trace, a_is_expected } = self;
at.infcx.commit_if_ok(|_| {
let mut fields = at.infcx.combine_fields(trace, at.param_env, define_opaque_types);
fields
.equate(a_is_expected)
.relate(a, b)
.map(move |_| InferOk { value: (), obligations: fields.obligations })
})
let mut fields = at.infcx.combine_fields(trace, at.param_env, define_opaque_types);
fields
.equate(a_is_expected)
.relate(a, b)
.map(move |_| InferOk { value: (), obligations: fields.obligations })
}

#[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
Expand All @@ -317,13 +313,11 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Trace<'a, 'tcx> {
T: Relate<'tcx>,
{
let Trace { at, trace, a_is_expected } = self;
at.infcx.commit_if_ok(|_| {
let mut fields = at.infcx.combine_fields(trace, at.param_env, define_opaque_types);
fields
.lub(a_is_expected)
.relate(a, b)
.map(move |t| InferOk { value: t, obligations: fields.obligations })
})
let mut fields = at.infcx.combine_fields(trace, at.param_env, define_opaque_types);
fields
.lub(a_is_expected)
.relate(a, b)
.map(move |t| InferOk { value: t, obligations: fields.obligations })
}

#[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
Expand All @@ -332,13 +326,11 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Trace<'a, 'tcx> {
T: Relate<'tcx>,
{
let Trace { at, trace, a_is_expected } = self;
at.infcx.commit_if_ok(|_| {
let mut fields = at.infcx.combine_fields(trace, at.param_env, define_opaque_types);
fields
.glb(a_is_expected)
.relate(a, b)
.map(move |t| InferOk { value: t, obligations: fields.obligations })
})
let mut fields = at.infcx.combine_fields(trace, at.param_env, define_opaque_types);
fields
.glb(a_is_expected)
.relate(a, b)
.map(move |t| InferOk { value: t, obligations: fields.obligations })
}
}

Expand Down
66 changes: 32 additions & 34 deletions compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/canonical/query_response.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -620,42 +620,40 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
variables1: &OriginalQueryValues<'tcx>,
variables2: impl Fn(BoundVar) -> GenericArg<'tcx>,
) -> InferResult<'tcx, ()> {
self.commit_if_ok(|_| {
let mut obligations = vec![];
for (index, value1) in variables1.var_values.iter().enumerate() {
let value2 = variables2(BoundVar::new(index));

match (value1.unpack(), value2.unpack()) {
(GenericArgKind::Type(v1), GenericArgKind::Type(v2)) => {
obligations.extend(
self.at(cause, param_env)
.eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, v1, v2)?
.into_obligations(),
);
}
(GenericArgKind::Lifetime(re1), GenericArgKind::Lifetime(re2))
if re1.is_erased() && re2.is_erased() =>
{
// no action needed
}
(GenericArgKind::Lifetime(v1), GenericArgKind::Lifetime(v2)) => {
obligations.extend(
self.at(cause, param_env)
.eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, v1, v2)?
.into_obligations(),
);
}
(GenericArgKind::Const(v1), GenericArgKind::Const(v2)) => {
let ok = self.at(cause, param_env).eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, v1, v2)?;
obligations.extend(ok.into_obligations());
}
_ => {
bug!("kind mismatch, cannot unify {:?} and {:?}", value1, value2,);
}
let mut obligations = vec![];
for (index, value1) in variables1.var_values.iter().enumerate() {
let value2 = variables2(BoundVar::new(index));

match (value1.unpack(), value2.unpack()) {
(GenericArgKind::Type(v1), GenericArgKind::Type(v2)) => {
obligations.extend(
self.at(cause, param_env)
.eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, v1, v2)?
.into_obligations(),
);
}
(GenericArgKind::Lifetime(re1), GenericArgKind::Lifetime(re2))
if re1.is_erased() && re2.is_erased() =>
{
// no action needed
}
(GenericArgKind::Lifetime(v1), GenericArgKind::Lifetime(v2)) => {
obligations.extend(
self.at(cause, param_env)
.eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, v1, v2)?
.into_obligations(),
);
}
(GenericArgKind::Const(v1), GenericArgKind::Const(v2)) => {
let ok = self.at(cause, param_env).eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, v1, v2)?;
obligations.extend(ok.into_obligations());
}
_ => {
bug!("kind mismatch, cannot unify {:?} and {:?}", value1, value2,);
}
}
Ok(InferOk { value: (), obligations })
})
}
Ok(InferOk { value: (), obligations })
}
}

Expand Down
12 changes: 6 additions & 6 deletions compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/confirmation.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -192,13 +192,13 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
&mut obligations,
);

obligations.extend(self.infcx.commit_if_ok(|_| {
obligations.extend(
self.infcx
.at(&obligation.cause, obligation.param_env)
.sup(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, placeholder_trait_predicate, candidate)
.map(|InferOk { obligations, .. }| obligations)
.map_err(|_| Unimplemented)
})?);
.map_err(|_| Unimplemented)?,
);

// FIXME(compiler-errors): I don't think this is needed.
if let ty::Alias(ty::Projection, alias_ty) = placeholder_self_ty.kind() {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -532,13 +532,13 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
&mut nested,
);

nested.extend(self.infcx.commit_if_ok(|_| {
nested.extend(
self.infcx
.at(&obligation.cause, obligation.param_env)
.sup(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, obligation_trait_ref, upcast_trait_ref)
.map(|InferOk { obligations, .. }| obligations)
.map_err(|_| Unimplemented)
})?);
.map_err(|_| Unimplemented)?,
);

// Check supertraits hold. This is so that their associated type bounds
// will be checked in the code below.
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ LL | |
LL | | });
| |______^ expected due to this
|
= note: expected closure signature `fn(_, _) -> _`
found closure signature `fn(u32, i32) -> _`
= note: expected closure signature `fn(_, u32) -> _`
found closure signature `fn(_, i32) -> _`
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not caused by the lhs now being an infer var, but instead by TypeErrCtxt::cmp eliding it because the types are the same. I have to admit that I really dislike that function

note: required by a bound in `with_closure`
--> $DIR/expect-infer-var-appearing-twice.rs:2:14
|
Expand Down
Loading