Rollup of 9 pull requests #121890
Merged
Rollup of 9 pull requests #121890
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When reading through this, I got slightly hung up thinking the `let` it was referring to was the `let tmp` on line 25, which was confusing considering the comment states that the temporary is freed at the end of the block. I think adding this clarification could potentially help some beginners like myself without being overly verbose.
To the module where it is used, so it doesn't have to be `pub`.
This just moves the server-relevant parts of handles into `server.rs`. It introduces a new higher-order macro `with_api_handle_types` to avoid some duplication. This fixes two `FIXME` comments, and makes things clearer, by not having server code in `client.rs`.
Clearer wording
fix typo in documentation for std::fs::Permissions Please check and re-check this PR carefully to see if I got this right. But by my logic, if the `read_only` function returns `true`, I would not expect be able to write to the file (it being read only); so this text is meant to clarify that `read_only` being `false` doesn't mean *you* can actually write to the file, just that "in general" someone is able to.
Update E0716.md for clarity When reading through this, I got slightly hung up thinking the `let` it was referring to was the `let tmp` on line 25, which was confusing considering the comment states that the temporary is freed at the end of the block. I think adding this clarification could potentially help some beginners like myself without being overly verbose.
…sper match lowering: pre-simplify or-patterns too This is the final part of my work to simplify match pairs early: now we do it for or-patterns too. This makes it possible to collect fake borrows separately from the main match lowering algorithm. That'll enable more simplifications of or-pattern handling. Note: I was tempted to have `Candidate` contain a `FlatPat`, but there are so many places that use `candidate.match_pairs` etc directly that I chose not to. r? `@matthewjasper`
Display short types for unimplemented trait
Shortens unimplemented trait diagnostics. Now shows:
```
error[E0277]: `Option<Option<Option<...>>>` doesn't implement `std::fmt::Display`
--> $DIR/on_unimplemented_long_types.rs:4:17
|
LL | pub fn foo() -> impl std::fmt::Display {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ `Option<Option<Option<...>>>` cannot be formatted with the default formatter
LL |
LL | / Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(S...
LL | | Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(So...
LL | | Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Som...
LL | | Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Some...
... |
LL | | ))))))))))),
LL | | )))))))))))
| |_______________- return type was inferred to be `Option<Option<Option<...>>>` here
|
= help: the trait `std::fmt::Display` is not implemented for `Option<Option<Option<...>>>`
= note: in format strings you may be able to use `{:?}` (or {:#?} for pretty-print) instead
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0277`.
```
I'm not 100% sure if this is desirable, or if we should just let the long types remain long. This is also kinda a short-term bandaid solution. The real long term solution is to properly migrate `rustc_trait_selection`'s error reporting to use translatable diagnostics and then properly handle type name printing.
Fixes rust-lang#121687.
…est31 Move `gather_comments`. To the module where it is used, so it doesn't have to be `pub`. r? ```@est31```
Move `HandleStore` into `server.rs`. This just moves the server-relevant parts of handles into `server.rs`. It introduces a new higher-order macro `with_api_handle_types` to avoid some duplication. This fixes two `FIXME` comments, and makes things clearer, by not having server code in `client.rs`. r? ```@bjorn3```
…=cuviper Remove hidden use of Global Fixes rust-lang#121797
…les, r=workingjubilee Use the guaranteed precision of a couple of float functions in docs
…r-errors Account for unmet T: !Copy in E0277 message ``` error[E0277]: the trait bound `T: !Copy` is not satisfied --> $DIR/simple.rs:10:16 | LL | not_copy::<T>(); | ^ the trait bound `T: !Copy` is not satisfied ``` instead of the current ``` error[E0277]: the trait bound `T: !Copy` is not satisfied --> $DIR/simple.rs:10:16 | LL | not_copy::<T>(); | ^ the trait `!Copy` is not implemented for `T` ```
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=9 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 2e3581bca9 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
This was referenced Mar 2, 2024
|
Finished benchmarking commit (5257aee): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 652.002s -> 652.672s (0.10%) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
gather_comments. #121815 (Movegather_comments.)HandleStoreintoserver.rs. #121835 (MoveHandleStoreintoserver.rs.)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup