-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
match lowering: don't collect test alternatives ahead of time #121908
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Before, the SwitchInt cases were computed in two passes: if the first pass accepted e.g. 0..=5 and then 1, the second pass would not accept 0..=5 anymore because 1 would be listed in the SwitchInt options. Now there's a single pass, so if we sort 0..=5 we must take care to not sort a subsequent 1.
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Mar 2, 2024
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Mar 12, 2024
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2024
…on, r=matthewjasper match lowering: don't collect test alternatives ahead of time I'm very happy with this one. Before this, when sorting candidates into the possible test branches, we manually computed `usize` indices to determine in which branch each candidate goes. To make this work we had a first pass that collected the possible alternatives we'd have to deal with, and a second pass that actually sorts the candidates. In this PR, I replace `usize` indices with a dedicated enum. This makes `sort_candidates` easier to follow, and we don't need the first pass anymore. r? `@matthewjasper`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#121820 (pattern analysis: Store field indices in `DeconstructedPat` to avoid virtual wildcards) - rust-lang#121908 (match lowering: don't collect test alternatives ahead of time) - rust-lang#122203 (Add `intrinsic_name` to get plain intrinsic name) - rust-lang#122226 (coverage: Remove or migrate all unstable values of `-Cinstrument-coverage`) - rust-lang#122255 (Use `min_exhaustive_patterns` in core & std) - rust-lang#122360 ( Don't Create `ParamCandidate` When Obligation Contains Errors ) - rust-lang#122375 (CFI: Break tests into smaller files) - rust-lang#122383 (Enable PR tracking review assignment for rust-lang/rust) - rust-lang#122386 (Move `Once` implementations to `sys`) - rust-lang#122400 (Fix ICE in diagnostics for parenthesized type arguments) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#121820 (pattern analysis: Store field indices in `DeconstructedPat` to avoid virtual wildcards) - rust-lang#121908 (match lowering: don't collect test alternatives ahead of time) - rust-lang#122203 (Add `intrinsic_name` to get plain intrinsic name) - rust-lang#122226 (coverage: Remove or migrate all unstable values of `-Cinstrument-coverage`) - rust-lang#122255 (Use `min_exhaustive_patterns` in core & std) - rust-lang#122360 ( Don't Create `ParamCandidate` When Obligation Contains Errors ) - rust-lang#122383 (Enable PR tracking review assignment for rust-lang/rust) - rust-lang#122386 (Move `Once` implementations to `sys`) - rust-lang#122400 (Fix ICE in diagnostics for parenthesized type arguments) - rust-lang#122410 (rustdoc: do not preload fonts when browsing locally) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#121908 - Nadrieril:dynamic-variant-collection, r=matthewjasper match lowering: don't collect test alternatives ahead of time I'm very happy with this one. Before this, when sorting candidates into the possible test branches, we manually computed `usize` indices to determine in which branch each candidate goes. To make this work we had a first pass that collected the possible alternatives we'd have to deal with, and a second pass that actually sorts the candidates. In this PR, I replace `usize` indices with a dedicated enum. This makes `sort_candidates` easier to follow, and we don't need the first pass anymore. r? ``@matthewjasper``
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm very happy with this one. Before this, when sorting candidates into the possible test branches, we manually computed
usize
indices to determine in which branch each candidate goes. To make this work we had a first pass that collected the possible alternatives we'd have to deal with, and a second pass that actually sorts the candidates.In this PR, I replace
usize
indices with a dedicated enum. This makessort_candidates
easier to follow, and we don't need the first pass anymore.r? @matthewjasper