Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't ICE if we collect no RPITITs unless there are no unification errors #122172

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 8, 2024

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Move an assertion in collect_return_position_impl_trait_in_trait_tys to after the ObligationCtxt::eq calls, so that we only assert and ICE if we have unification errors.

Fixes #121468

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 8, 2024

r? @fmease

rustbot has assigned @fmease.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 8, 2024
Copy link
Member

@fmease fmease left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense, thanks! r=me with preexisting nit addressed.

Comment on lines 642 to 645
debug_assert_ne!(
collector.types.len(),
0,
"expect >1 RPITITs in call to `collect_return_position_impl_trait_in_trait_tys`"
);
Copy link
Member

@fmease fmease Mar 8, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(preexisting) Minor nitpick: The message of the assertion isn't correct, it should either say >=1 or >0. Furthermore, I'd probably use debug_assert + !collector.types.is_empty().

@rust-cloud-vms rust-cloud-vms bot force-pushed the rpitit-collect-ice branch from 79b8b32 to 07bd05e Compare March 8, 2024 15:52
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=fmease rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 8, 2024

📌 Commit 07bd05e has been approved by fmease

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 8, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#121201 (align_offset, align_to: no longer allow implementations to spuriously fail to align)
 - rust-lang#122076 (Tweak the way we protect in-place function arguments in interpreters)
 - rust-lang#122100 (Better comment for implicit captures in RPITIT)
 - rust-lang#122157 (Add the new description field to Target::to_json, and add descriptions for some MSVC targets)
 - rust-lang#122164 (Fix misaligned loads when loading UEFI arg pointers)
 - rust-lang#122171 (Add some new solver tests)
 - rust-lang#122172 (Don't ICE if we collect no RPITITs unless there are no unification errors)
 - rust-lang#122197 (inspect formatter: add braces)
 - rust-lang#122198 (Remove handling for previously dropped LLVM version)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 02b89d1 into rust-lang:master Mar 8, 2024
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.78.0 milestone Mar 8, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#122172 - compiler-errors:rpitit-collect-ice, r=fmease

Don't ICE if we collect no RPITITs unless there are no unification errors

Move an assertion in `collect_return_position_impl_trait_in_trait_tys` to after the `ObligationCtxt::eq` calls, so that we only assert and ICE if we have unification errors.

Fixes rust-lang#121468
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ICE: expect >1 RPITITs in call to 'collect_return_position_impl_trait_in_trait_tys'
4 participants