-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 15 pull requests #122338
Rollup of 15 pull requests #122338
Conversation
This clarifies that we're adding an "entry point", not just adding an "entry" of some kind.
This allows us to use real field names instead of tuple element numbers. Renaming `previous_drops` to `existing_drops_map` clarifies that "previous" was unrelated to drop order.
Like field offsets, these are always constant.
The `sig_dfl` variant of the attribute is the most likely variant to be stabilized first, and thus to become the "most allowed" variant of the attribute. Because of this, it is the most appropriate variant to use in syntax tests, because even if the most allowed variant is used, the compiler shall still emit errors if it e.g. is used in the wrong places.
@bors r+ rollup=never p=15 |
🧿 🧿 🧿 🧿 🧿 🧿 🧿 |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 65cd843ae0 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
Finished benchmarking commit (6554a56): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 652.28s -> 669.92s (2.70%) |
Can #122320 be rerun here for perf? |
I don't think we'll produce meaningfully different results, but why not: @rust-timer build 2b188cc |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Finished benchmarking commit (2b188cc): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action neededInstruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 652.28s -> 651.81s (-0.07%) |
Successful merges:
DropTree
#122080 (Clarity improvements toDropTree
)field_remapping
field fromTypeLowering
#122166 (Remove the unusedfield_remapping
field fromTypeLowering
)must_produce_diag
#122299 (Store backtrace formust_produce_diag
)inherit
withsig_dfl
in syntax tests #122328 (unix_sigpipe: Replaceinherit
withsig_dfl
in syntax tests)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup