tests: Add ui/attributes/unix_sigpipe/unix_sigpipe-str-list.rs #122363
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Which is a variant of [`unix_sigpipe-list.rs`][1] but where a string is used instead of an identifier. This makes it more similar to the proper form `#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]` and thus more likely to be written by users by mistake. Also rename the first test to be more in line with the terminology of [The Reference][2]. [1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/ui/attributes/unix_sigpipe/unix_sigpipe-list.rs [2]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#meta-item-attribute-syntax
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2024
…kingjubilee Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#121754 ([bootstrap] Move the `split-debuginfo` setting to the per-target section) - rust-lang#121953 (Add tests for the generated assembly of mask related simd instructions.) - rust-lang#122081 (validate `builder::PATH_REMAP`) - rust-lang#122245 (Detect truncated DepGraph files) - rust-lang#122354 (bootstrap: Don't eagerly format verbose messages) - rust-lang#122355 (rustdoc: fix up old test) - rust-lang#122363 (tests: Add ui/attributes/unix_sigpipe/unix_sigpipe-str-list.rs) - rust-lang#122366 (Fix stack overflow with recursive associated types) - rust-lang#122377 (Fix discriminant_kind copy paste from the pointee trait case) - rust-lang#122378 (Properly rebuild rustbooks) - rust-lang#122380 (Fix typo in lib.rs of proc_macro) - rust-lang#122381 (llvm-wrapper: adapt for LLVM API changes) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#122363 - Enselic:unix_sigpipe-str-list, r=oli-obk tests: Add ui/attributes/unix_sigpipe/unix_sigpipe-str-list.rs Which is a variant of [`unix_sigpipe-list.rs`][1] but where a string is used instead of an identifier. This makes it more similar to the proper form `#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]` and thus more likely to be written by users by mistake. Having a test for this case gives peace of mind. Also rename the first test to be more in line with the terminology of [The Reference][2]. [1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/ui/attributes/unix_sigpipe/unix_sigpipe-list.rs [2]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#meta-item-attribute-syntax Tracking issue: rust-lang#97889
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which is a variant of
unix_sigpipe-list.rsbut where a string is used instead of an identifier. This makes it more similar to the proper form#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]and thus more likely to be written by users by mistake. Having a test for this case gives peace of mind.Also rename the first test to be more in line with the terminology of The Reference.
Tracking issue: #97889