Improve Step docs
#122421
Merged
Improve Step docs
#122421
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
jhpratt
reviewed
Mar 13, 2024
|
@rustbot claim Minus the one nit, LGTM. |
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
jhpratt
added a commit
to jhpratt/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 14, 2024
Improve `Step` docs It [came up on urlo](https://users.rust-lang.org/t/implement-trait-step-in-1-76-0/108204?u=cad97) that the unstable reason string isn't helpful, so just remove it; there's nothing meaningful to add here. Also makes a couple drive-by improvements to the method docs -- removes incorrect references, changes `forward_checked`'s invariant formulation to match `backward_checked`'s, and adds a helpful corollary that `step_unchecked(a, 0)` is always safe.
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 14, 2024
Improve `Step` docs It [came up on urlo](https://users.rust-lang.org/t/implement-trait-step-in-1-76-0/108204?u=cad97) that the unstable reason string isn't helpful, so just remove it; there's nothing meaningful to add here. Also makes a couple drive-by improvements to the method docs -- removes incorrect references, changes `forward_checked`'s invariant formulation to match `backward_checked`'s, and adds a helpful corollary that `step_unchecked(a, 0)` is always safe.
This was referenced Mar 14, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 14, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#104353 (Add CStr::bytes iterator) - rust-lang#119676 (rustdoc-search: search types by higher-order functions) - rust-lang#120699 (Document `TRACK_DIAGNOSTIC` calls.) - rust-lang#121899 (Document how removing a type's field can be bad and what to do instead) - rust-lang#122405 (Add methods to create StableMIR constant) - rust-lang#122416 (Various style improvements to `rustc_lint::levels`) - rust-lang#122421 (Improve `Step` docs) - rust-lang#122440 (const-eval: organize and extend tests for required-consts) - rust-lang#122461 (fix unsoundness in Step::forward_unchecked for signed integers) Failed merges: - rust-lang#122397 (Various cleanups around the const eval query providers) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 14, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#122421 - CAD97:step-trait-docs, r=jhpratt Improve `Step` docs It [came up on urlo](https://users.rust-lang.org/t/implement-trait-step-in-1-76-0/108204?u=cad97) that the unstable reason string isn't helpful, so just remove it; there's nothing meaningful to add here. Also makes a couple drive-by improvements to the method docs -- removes incorrect references, changes `forward_checked`'s invariant formulation to match `backward_checked`'s, and adds a helpful corollary that `step_unchecked(a, 0)` is always safe.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It came up on urlo that the unstable reason string isn't helpful, so just remove it; there's nothing meaningful to add here.
Also makes a couple drive-by improvements to the method docs -- removes incorrect references, changes
forward_checked's invariant formulation to matchbackward_checked's, and adds a helpful corollary thatstep_unchecked(a, 0)is always safe.