Rollup of 2 pull requests

[matthiaskrgr]

Successful merges:

• Inline more svg images into CSS #123734 (Inline more svg images into CSS)
• Port print-cfg run-make test to Rust-based rmake.rs #124473 (Port print-cfg run-make test to Rust-based rmake.rs)

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

[matthiaskrgr]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=2

[bors]

📌 Commit 6edb721 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 6edb721 with merge 10505a1...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 10505a1 to master...

[rust-timer]

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Message	Perf Build Sha
#123734	Inline more svg images into CSS	c9feda6500e32040eaccad7d9f1b1726b59f8980 (link)
#124473	Port print-cfg run-make test to Rust-based rmake.rs	ba6285d1d06ac0c46b20373f96fa98aa3550c022 (link)

previous master: ce609db948

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (10505a1): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.8%	[-1.8%, -1.8%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.8%	[-1.8%, -1.8%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 673.364s -> 673.47s (0.02%)
Artifact size: 315.95 MiB -> 315.96 MiB (0.00%)