-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add SingleUseConsts
mir-opt pass
#125910
Merged
Merged
Add SingleUseConsts
mir-opt pass
#125910
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@ | ||
use rustc_index::{bit_set::BitSet, IndexVec}; | ||
use rustc_middle::bug; | ||
use rustc_middle::mir::visit::{MutVisitor, PlaceContext, Visitor}; | ||
use rustc_middle::mir::*; | ||
use rustc_middle::ty::TyCtxt; | ||
|
||
/// Various parts of MIR building introduce temporaries that are commonly not needed. | ||
/// | ||
/// Notably, `if CONST` and `match CONST` end up being used-once temporaries, which | ||
/// obfuscates the structure for other passes and codegen, which would like to always | ||
/// be able to just see the constant directly. | ||
/// | ||
/// At higher optimization levels fancier passes like GVN will take care of this | ||
/// in a more general fashion, but this handles the easy cases so can run in debug. | ||
/// | ||
/// This only removes constants with a single-use because re-evaluating constants | ||
/// isn't always an improvement, especially for large ones. | ||
/// | ||
/// It also removes *never*-used constants, since it had all the information | ||
/// needed to do that too, including updating the debug info. | ||
pub struct SingleUseConsts; | ||
|
||
impl<'tcx> MirPass<'tcx> for SingleUseConsts { | ||
fn is_enabled(&self, sess: &rustc_session::Session) -> bool { | ||
sess.mir_opt_level() > 0 | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn run_pass(&self, tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, body: &mut Body<'tcx>) { | ||
let mut finder = SingleUseConstsFinder { | ||
ineligible_locals: BitSet::new_empty(body.local_decls.len()), | ||
locations: IndexVec::from_elem(LocationPair::new(), &body.local_decls), | ||
locals_in_debug_info: BitSet::new_empty(body.local_decls.len()), | ||
}; | ||
|
||
finder.ineligible_locals.insert_range(..=Local::from_usize(body.arg_count)); | ||
|
||
finder.visit_body(body); | ||
|
||
for (local, locations) in finder.locations.iter_enumerated() { | ||
if finder.ineligible_locals.contains(local) { | ||
continue; | ||
} | ||
|
||
let Some(init_loc) = locations.init_loc else { | ||
continue; | ||
}; | ||
|
||
// We're only changing an operand, not the terminator kinds or successors | ||
let basic_blocks = body.basic_blocks.as_mut_preserves_cfg(); | ||
let init_statement = | ||
basic_blocks[init_loc.block].statements[init_loc.statement_index].replace_nop(); | ||
let StatementKind::Assign(place_and_rvalue) = init_statement.kind else { | ||
bug!("No longer an assign?"); | ||
}; | ||
let (place, rvalue) = *place_and_rvalue; | ||
assert_eq!(place.as_local(), Some(local)); | ||
let Rvalue::Use(operand) = rvalue else { bug!("No longer a use?") }; | ||
|
||
let mut replacer = LocalReplacer { tcx, local, operand: Some(operand) }; | ||
|
||
if finder.locals_in_debug_info.contains(local) { | ||
for var_debug_info in &mut body.var_debug_info { | ||
replacer.visit_var_debug_info(var_debug_info); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
let Some(use_loc) = locations.use_loc else { continue }; | ||
|
||
let use_block = &mut basic_blocks[use_loc.block]; | ||
if let Some(use_statement) = use_block.statements.get_mut(use_loc.statement_index) { | ||
replacer.visit_statement(use_statement, use_loc); | ||
} else { | ||
replacer.visit_terminator(use_block.terminator_mut(), use_loc); | ||
} | ||
|
||
if replacer.operand.is_some() { | ||
bug!( | ||
"operand wasn't used replacing local {local:?} with locations {locations:?} in body {body:#?}" | ||
); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug)] | ||
struct LocationPair { | ||
init_loc: Option<Location>, | ||
use_loc: Option<Location>, | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl LocationPair { | ||
fn new() -> Self { | ||
Self { init_loc: None, use_loc: None } | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
struct SingleUseConstsFinder { | ||
ineligible_locals: BitSet<Local>, | ||
locations: IndexVec<Local, LocationPair>, | ||
locals_in_debug_info: BitSet<Local>, | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl<'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for SingleUseConstsFinder { | ||
fn visit_assign(&mut self, place: &Place<'tcx>, rvalue: &Rvalue<'tcx>, location: Location) { | ||
if let Some(local) = place.as_local() | ||
&& let Rvalue::Use(operand) = rvalue | ||
&& let Operand::Constant(_) = operand | ||
{ | ||
let locations = &mut self.locations[local]; | ||
if locations.init_loc.is_some() { | ||
self.ineligible_locals.insert(local); | ||
} else { | ||
locations.init_loc = Some(location); | ||
} | ||
} else { | ||
self.super_assign(place, rvalue, location); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn visit_operand(&mut self, operand: &Operand<'tcx>, location: Location) { | ||
if let Some(place) = operand.place() | ||
&& let Some(local) = place.as_local() | ||
{ | ||
let locations = &mut self.locations[local]; | ||
if locations.use_loc.is_some() { | ||
self.ineligible_locals.insert(local); | ||
} else { | ||
locations.use_loc = Some(location); | ||
} | ||
} else { | ||
self.super_operand(operand, location); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn visit_statement(&mut self, statement: &Statement<'tcx>, location: Location) { | ||
match &statement.kind { | ||
// Storage markers are irrelevant to this. | ||
StatementKind::StorageLive(_) | StatementKind::StorageDead(_) => {} | ||
_ => self.super_statement(statement, location), | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn visit_var_debug_info(&mut self, var_debug_info: &VarDebugInfo<'tcx>) { | ||
if let VarDebugInfoContents::Place(place) = &var_debug_info.value | ||
&& let Some(local) = place.as_local() | ||
{ | ||
self.locals_in_debug_info.insert(local); | ||
} else { | ||
self.super_var_debug_info(var_debug_info); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn visit_local(&mut self, local: Local, _context: PlaceContext, _location: Location) { | ||
// If there's any path that gets here, rather than being understood elsewhere, | ||
// then we'd better not do anything with this local. | ||
self.ineligible_locals.insert(local); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
struct LocalReplacer<'tcx> { | ||
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, | ||
local: Local, | ||
operand: Option<Operand<'tcx>>, | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl<'tcx> MutVisitor<'tcx> for LocalReplacer<'tcx> { | ||
fn tcx(&self) -> TyCtxt<'tcx> { | ||
self.tcx | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn visit_operand(&mut self, operand: &mut Operand<'tcx>, _location: Location) { | ||
if let Operand::Copy(place) | Operand::Move(place) = operand | ||
&& let Some(local) = place.as_local() | ||
&& local == self.local | ||
{ | ||
*operand = self.operand.take().unwrap_or_else(|| { | ||
bug!("there was a second use of the operand"); | ||
}); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn visit_var_debug_info(&mut self, var_debug_info: &mut VarDebugInfo<'tcx>) { | ||
if let VarDebugInfoContents::Place(place) = &var_debug_info.value | ||
&& let Some(local) = place.as_local() | ||
&& local == self.local | ||
{ | ||
let const_op = self | ||
.operand | ||
.as_ref() | ||
.unwrap_or_else(|| { | ||
bug!("the operand was already stolen"); | ||
}) | ||
.constant() | ||
.unwrap() | ||
.clone(); | ||
var_debug_info.value = VarDebugInfoContents::Const(const_op); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you deliberately avoiding using a box pattern?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I never even thought about using one -- my mental "how do I write a pattern for this" doesn't use the unstable stuff.
Since this is infallible, my instinct is to not use it. When it makes the control flow way easier in a refutable pattern then sure I'd say to use a box pattern, but here that's not the case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mm I meant if you use a box pattern you can combine these two lines. As far as I'm aware, a box pattern is the only way to do so.
But if you don't want to that's fine. I'm just used to seeing box patterns used for matching on StatementKind::Assign.