Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 10 pull requests #126635

Closed
wants to merge 26 commits into from

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

Gurinder Singh and others added 26 commits May 13, 2024 17:42
Previously, `Tree::from_enum`'s implementation branched into three disjoint
cases:

 1. enums that uninhabited
 2. enums for which all but one variant is uninhabited
 3. enums with multiple inhabited variants

This branching (incorrectly) did not differentiate between variantful and
variantless uninhabited enums. In both cases, we assumed (and asserted) that
uninhabited enums are zero-sized types. This assumption is false for enums like:

    enum Uninhabited { A(!, u128) }

...which, currently, has the same size as `u128`. This faulty assumption
manifested as the ICE reported in rust-lang#126460.

In this PR, we revise the first case of `Tree::from_enum` to consider only the
narrow category of "enums that are uninhabited ZSTs". These enums, whose layouts
are described with `Variants::Single { index }`, are special in their layouts
otherwise resemble the `!` type and cannot be descended into like typical enums.
This first case captures uninhabited enums like:

    enum Uninhabited { A(!, !), B(!) }

The second case is revised to consider the broader category of "enums that defer
their layout to one of their variants"; i.e., enums whose layouts are described
with `Variants::Single { index }` and that do have a variant at `index`. This
second case captures uninhabited enums that are not ZSTs, like:

    enum Uninhabited { A(!, u128) }

...which represent their variants with `Variants::Single`.

Finally, the third case is revised to cover the broader category of "enums with
multiple variants", which captures uninhabited, non-ZST enums like:

    enum Uninhabited { A(u8, !), B(!, u32) }

...which represent their variants with `Variants::Multiple`.

This PR also adds a comment requested by RalfJung in his review of rust-lang#126358 to
`compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/discriminant.rs`.

Fixes rust-lang#126460
…ram" note

- Avoid "caller chooses ty for type param" note if the found type a.k.a.
  the return expression type *contains* the type parameter, because e.g.
  `&T` will always be different from `T` (i.e. "well duh").
- Rename `note_caller_chooses_ty_for_ty_param` to
  `try_note_caller_chooses_ty_for_ty_param` because the note is not
  always made.

Issue: rust-lang#126547
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
This is already handled at the config parsing level, so we can simplify it.

Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Co-authored-by: Oli Scherer <github35764891676564198441@oli-obk.de>
…r-errors

Test that opaque types can't have themselves as a hidden type with incompatible lifetimes

fixes rust-lang#122876

This PR used to add extra logic to prevent those cases, but after rust-lang#113169 this is implicitly rejected, because such usages are not defining.
…field, r=jackh726

Suggest removing unused tuple fields if they are the last fields

Fixes rust-lang#124556

We now check if dead/unused fields are the last fields of the tuple and suggest their removal instead of suggesting them to be changed to `()`.
…trait, r=compiler-errors

improve tip for inaccessible traits

Improve the tips when the candidate method is from an inaccessible trait.

For example:

```rs
mod m {
  trait Trait {
    fn f() {}
  }
  impl<T> Trait for T {}
}

fn main() {
  struct S;
  S::f();
}
```

The difference between before and now is:

```diff
error[E0599]: no function or associated item named `f` found for struct `S` in the current scope
  --> ./src/main.rs:88:6
   |
LL |   struct S;
   |   -------- function or associated item `f` not found for this struct
LL |   S::f();
   |      ^ function or associated item not found in `S`
   |
   = help: items from traits can only be used if the trait is implemented and in scope
- help: trait `Trait` which provides `f` is implemented but not in scope; perhaps you want to import it
+ help: trait `crate::m::Trait` which provides `f` is implemented but not reachable
   |
- LL + use crate::m::Trait;
   |
```
Rewrite `intrinsic-unreachable`, `sepcomp-cci-copies`, `sepcomp-inlining` and `sepcomp-separate` `run-make` tests to rmake.rs

Part of rust-lang#121876 and the associated [Google Summer of Code project](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/05/01/gsoc-2024-selected-projects.html).
safe transmute: support non-ZST, variantful, uninhabited enums

Previously, `Tree::from_enum`'s implementation branched into three disjoint cases:

 1. enums that uninhabited
 2. enums for which all but one variant is uninhabited
 3. enums with multiple variants

This branching (incorrectly) did not differentiate between variantful and variantless uninhabited enums. In both cases, we assumed (and asserted) that uninhabited enums are zero-sized types. This assumption is false for enums like:

    enum Uninhabited { A(!, u128) }

...which, currently, has the same size as `u128`. This faulty assumption manifested as the ICE reported in rust-lang#126460.

In this PR, we revise the first case of `Tree::from_enum` to consider only the narrow category of "enums that are uninhabited ZSTs". These enums, whose layouts are described with `Variants::Single { index }`, are special in their layouts otherwise resemble the `!` type and cannot be descended into like typical enums. This first case captures uninhabited enums like:

    enum Uninhabited { A(!, !), B(!) }

The second case is revised to consider the broader category of "enums that defer their layout to one of their variants"; i.e., enums whose layouts are described with `Variants::Single { index }` and that do have a variant at `index`. This second case captures uninhabited enums that are not ZSTs, like:

    enum Uninhabited { A(!, u128) }

...which represent their variants with `Variants::Single`.

Finally, the third case is revised to cover the broader category of "enums with multiple variants", which captures uninhabited enums like:

    enum Uninhabited { A(u8, !), B(!, u32) }

...which represent their variants with `Variants::Multiple`.

This PR also adds a comment requested by `@RalfJung` in his review of rust-lang#126358 to `compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/discriminant.rs`.

Fixes rust-lang#126460

r? `@compiler-errors`
hir_typeck: be more conservative in making "note caller chooses ty param" note

In rust-lang#122195 I added a "caller chooses ty for type param" note for when the return expression type a.k.a. found type does not match the expected return type.

rust-lang#126547 found that this note was confusing when the found return type *contains* the expected type, e.g.

```rs
fn f<T>(t: &T) -> T {
    t
}
```

because the found return type `&T` will *always* be different from the expected return type `T`, so the note was needlessly redundant and confusing.

This PR addresses that by not making the note if the found return type contains the expected return type.

r? `@fmease` (since you reviewed the original PR)

Fixes rust-lang#126547
…by789

override user defined channel when using precompiled rustc

We need to override `rust.channel` if it's manually specified when using the CI rustc. This is because if the compiler uses a different channel than the one specified in config.toml, tests may fail due to using a different channel than the one used by the compiler during tests.

For more context, see rust-lang#122709 (comment).
…drop-glue, r=oli-obk

Make async drop code more consistent with regular drop code

Fixes rust-lang#126573

Relates to rust-lang#126482

r? `@petrochenkov`
…-errors

Add `rustc-ice*` to `.gitignore`

I am a bit surprised this wasn't already here but there doesn't seem to be any reason not to add it. This will be nice to cut down on `git {add, diff, etc}` noise when debugging crashes.
…-v2, r=Nilstrieb

Replace `move||` with `move ||`

Edit from rust-lang#126631 to revert changes in `tests/ui`.

There are 18 instances of `move||` across 6 files in the repo:
- `compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/typeck_root_ctxt.rs`
- `library/core/src/sync/atomic.rs`
- `library/std/src/sync/condvar.rs`
- `library/std/src/sync/mpsc/mod.rs`
- `library/std/src/sync/barrier.rs`
- `library/std/src/thread/local.rs`

I have replaced all such instances with `move ||` instead as it better adheres to modern formatting standards.

Ideally, we would have this automated by rustfmt or some other tool, but I do not have the time to implement such a feature or tool.
Nonetheless, I would encourage any effort invested into such a tool or feature.
@rustbot rustbot added A-run-make Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc PG-exploit-mitigations Project group: Exploit mitigations S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 18, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jun 18, 2024
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ p=5 rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 18, 2024

📌 Commit 536bd22 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 18, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 18, 2024

🔒 Merge conflict

This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again.

How do I rebase?

Assuming self is your fork and upstream is this repository, you can resolve the conflict following these steps:

  1. git checkout rollup-c7ay6mz (switch to your branch)
  2. git fetch upstream master (retrieve the latest master)
  3. git rebase upstream/master -p (rebase on top of it)
  4. Follow the on-screen instruction to resolve conflicts (check git status if you got lost).
  5. git push self rollup-c7ay6mz --force-with-lease (update this PR)

You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial.

Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses git merge instead of git rebase which makes the PR commit history more difficult to read.

Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Cargo.lock conflict is handled during merge and rebase. This is normal, and you should still perform step 5 to update this PR.

Error message
Removing tests/run-make/sepcomp-separate/Makefile
Removing tests/run-make/sepcomp-inlining/Makefile
Removing tests/run-make/sepcomp-cci-copies/Makefile
Removing tests/run-make/intrinsic-unreachable/Makefile
Auto-merging compiler/rustc_passes/src/errors.rs
Auto-merging compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/method/suggest.rs
Auto-merging compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/fn_ctxt/suggestions.rs
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/fn_ctxt/suggestions.rs
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jun 18, 2024
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the rollup-c7ay6mz branch June 18, 2024 19:41
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 18, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #126623) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-run-make Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc PG-exploit-mitigations Project group: Exploit mitigations rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.