Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make feature(effects) require -Znext-solver #127176

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 1, 2024

Conversation

fee1-dead
Copy link
Member

Per #120639 (review)

I made this a hard error because otherwise it should be a lint and that seemed more complicated. Not sure if this is the best place to put the error though.

r? project-const-traits

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 30, 2024
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup=never since it may be bitrotty

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 30, 2024

📌 Commit daff015 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 30, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 1, 2024

⌛ Testing commit daff015 with merge f92a6c4...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 1, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: compiler-errors
Pushing f92a6c4 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jul 1, 2024
@bors bors merged commit f92a6c4 into rust-lang:master Jul 1, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.81.0 milestone Jul 1, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (f92a6c4): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -2.0%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.0% [-2.0%, -2.0%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results (secondary 2.7%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.7% [2.4%, 3.0%] 4
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 697.036s -> 697.828s (0.11%)
Artifact size: 324.65 MiB -> 324.64 MiB (-0.00%)

jaisnan added a commit to model-checking/kani that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2024
Upgrade toolchain to 7/12

Relevant PRs: rust-lang/rust#127176
and
rust-lang/rust#125507


Resolves #3319

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made
under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses.
@fee1-dead fee1-dead added the PG-const-traits Project group: Const traits label Aug 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. PG-const-traits Project group: Const traits S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants