Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't output incremental test artifacts into working directory #128038

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2024

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors commented Jul 21, 2024

Currently tests can ICE when the test spits out inc-fat incremental artifacts directly into the top of the git checkout, and then the compiler version changes, and it reads nonsense incremental artifacts on a subsequent test run.

r? @oli-obk

cc @Oneirical, I think you added this -- I think the right flag to add when porting -Cincremental run-make tests is to use //@ incremental rather than manually specifying the -Cincremental rustflag.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 21, 2024

Could not assign reviewer from: oli-obk.
User(s) oli-obk are either the PR author, already assigned, or on vacation, and there are no other candidates.
Use r? to specify someone else to assign.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 21, 2024

r? @fee1-dead

rustbot has assigned @fee1-dead.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 21, 2024
@compiler-errors compiler-errors changed the title Don't output test artifacts into working directory Don't output incremental test artifacts into working directory Jul 21, 2024
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Jul 21, 2024

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 21, 2024

📌 Commit 6a9110a has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 21, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2024
…kingjubilee

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#127583 (Deal with invalid UTF-8 from `gai_strerror`)
 - rust-lang#128014 (Fix stab display in doc blocks)
 - rust-lang#128020 (Just totally fully deny late-bound consts)
 - rust-lang#128023 (rustdoc: short descriptions cause word-breaks in tables)
 - rust-lang#128033 (Explain why we require `_` for empty patterns)
 - rust-lang#128038 (Don't output incremental test artifacts into working directory)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit fdef1d9 into rust-lang:master Jul 22, 2024
6 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#128038 - compiler-errors:inc-fat, r=oli-obk

Don't output incremental test artifacts into working directory

Currently tests can ICE when the test spits out `inc-fat` incremental artifacts directly into the top of the git checkout, and then the compiler version changes, and it reads nonsense incremental artifacts on a subsequent test run.

r? `@oli-obk`

cc `@Oneirical,` I think you added this -- I think the right flag to add when porting `-Cincremental` run-make tests is to use `//@ incremental` rather than manually specifying the `-Cincremental` rustflag.
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.82.0 milestone Jul 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants