Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #128330

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jul 29, 2024
Merged

Rollup of 5 pull requests #128330

merged 11 commits into from
Jul 29, 2024

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

workingjubilee and others added 11 commits July 22, 2024 11:22
In so doing, move the forbid up to the top of personality::dwarf
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Replace `io::Cursor::{remaining_slice, is_empty}`

This is a late follow up to the concerns raised in rust-lang#86369.

rust-lang#86369 (comment)
> This API seems focussed on the `Read` side of things. When `Seek`ing around and `Write`ing data, `is_empty` becomes confusing and `remaining_slice` is not very useful. When writing, the part of the slice before the cursor is much more interesting. Maybe we should have functions for both? Or a single function that returns both slices? (If we also have a `mut` version, a single function would be useful to allow mutable access to both sides at once.)

New feature name: `cursor_remaining` > `cursor_split`.
Added functions:
```rust
fn split(&self) -> (&[u8], &[u8]);
// fn before(&self) -> &[u8];
// fn after(&self) -> &[u8];
fn split_mut(&mut self) -> (&mut [u8], &mut [u8]);
// fn before_mut(&mut self) -> &mut [u8];
// fn after_mut(&mut self) -> &mut [u8];
```

A question was raised in rust-lang#86369 (comment) about whether to return a lifetime that would reflect the lifetime of the underlying bytes (`impl Cursor<&'a [u8]> { fn after(&self) -> &'a [u8] }`). The downside of doing this would be that it would not be possible to implement these functions generically over `T: AsRef<[u8]>`.

## Update
Based on the review, before* and after* methods where removed.
…on_types, r=aDotInTheVoid

Fully document `rustdoc-json-types`

100% of `rustdoc-json-types` is now documented
Here's the summary from rustdoc with `-Zunstable-options --show-coverage`:

```
+-------------------------------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
| File                                | Documented | Percentage |   Examples | Percentage |
+-------------------------------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
| src/rustdoc-json-types/lib.rs       |        314 |     100.0% |         23 |      31.9% |
+-------------------------------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
| Total                               |        314 |     100.0% |         23 |      31.9% |
+-------------------------------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
```
…sys-personality-dwarf-eh, r=Amanieu

std: unsafe-wrap personality::dwarf::eh

Moves the forbiddance up a little. This is another largely whitespace diff, except for hoisting some variable declarations to allow enclosing the `unsafe {}` scope fully and make it clearer where the bounds of some temporaries are.
…ns, r=Mark-Simulacrum

improve cargo invocations on bootstrap

Fixes few of the `FIXME`s on cargo invocations and should be considered as blocker for rust-lang#128180.
… r=tgross35

Add missing periods on `BTreeMap` cursor `peek_next` docs

Tracking issue: rust-lang#107540
@rustbot rustbot added A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jul 29, 2024
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=7

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 29, 2024

📌 Commit 0c6d2fb has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 29, 2024

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 100. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 29, 2024
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors treeclosed-

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 29, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 0c6d2fb with merge a5ee5cb...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 29, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing a5ee5cb to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jul 29, 2024
@bors bors merged commit a5ee5cb into rust-lang:master Jul 29, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.82.0 milestone Jul 29, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#109174 Replace io::Cursor::{remaining_slice, is_empty} 244e3d757f64a140ebdb5021c272c692b3123854 (link)
#127290 Fully document rustdoc-json-types d3907c44d36aec874fd910e38357c33ac91b092b (link)
#128055 std: unsafe-wrap personality::dwarf::eh 68790e47cc4fbdad30e479bd8b0d7ca0eea189c3 (link)
#128269 improve cargo invocations on bootstrap 5c88116ad87e3bce0381243ff9fcb2eb374cca8c (link)
#128310 Add missing periods on BTreeMap cursor peek_next docs c24af0144b83308a4993ff5ae6212efd6f74a0ec (link)

previous master: 2e630267b2

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a5ee5cb): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.7% [0.7%, 0.7%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.7% [0.7%, 0.7%] 1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -2.1%, secondary -2.6%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.1% [-2.1%, -2.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.6% [-2.6%, -2.6%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.1% [-2.1%, -2.1%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

Results (primary 0.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.1% [0.1%, 0.1%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.1% [0.1%, 0.1%] 1

Bootstrap: 769.325s -> 768.947s (-0.05%)
Artifact size: 331.39 MiB -> 331.47 MiB (0.03%)

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-auairjd branch September 1, 2024 17:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants