Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delegation: second attempt to improve perf #128441

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 4, 2024

Conversation

Bryanskiy
Copy link
Contributor

Possible perf fix for #125929

r? @petrochenkov

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 31, 2024
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jul 31, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2024
Delegation: second attempt to improve perf

Possible perf fix for rust-lang#125929

r? `@petrochenkov`
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 31, 2024

⌛ Trying commit 9b097b2 with merge 552a694...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 31, 2024

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 552a694 (552a69497bb18adcc5743503fec5d2f39bb4cfef)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (552a694): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.2% [0.2%, 0.2%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.4% [-0.6%, -0.2%] 6
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.6% [-1.2%, -0.1%] 10
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.4% [-0.6%, -0.2%] 6

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

Results (primary 3.2%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
3.2% [3.2%, 3.2%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 3.2% [3.2%, 3.2%] 1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 755.634s -> 755.372s (-0.03%)
Artifact size: 336.68 MiB -> 336.67 MiB (-0.00%)

@rustbot rustbot added perf-regression Performance regression. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Aug 1, 2024
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 1, 2024

📌 Commit 9b097b2 has been approved by petrochenkov

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 1, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 3, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 9b097b2 with merge 8f63e9f...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 4, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: petrochenkov
Pushing 8f63e9f to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Aug 4, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 8f63e9f into rust-lang:master Aug 4, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.82.0 milestone Aug 4, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (8f63e9f): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.4% [-0.7%, -0.2%] 9
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.5% [-1.1%, -0.1%] 9
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.4% [-0.7%, -0.2%] 9

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 0.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.2% [1.2%, 1.2%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.0% [-1.0%, -1.0%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.1% [-1.0%, 1.2%] 2

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 756.925s -> 757.678s (0.10%)
Artifact size: 336.81 MiB -> 336.76 MiB (-0.02%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants