Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a set of tests for LLVM 19 #128584

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

DianQK
Copy link
Member

@DianQK DianQK commented Aug 3, 2024

Close #107681. Close #118306. Close #126585.

r? compiler

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 3, 2024
// CHECK-NOT: select
// CHECK: [[RET:%.*]] = load i32, ptr
// CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[RET]]
x.next().unwrap_unchecked()
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

// CHECK-NEXT: [[SWITCH_GEP:%.*]] = getelementptr inbounds [4 x i64], ptr @switch.table.branchy, i64 0, i64 [[_2]]
// CHECK-NEXT: [[SWITCH_LOAD:%.*]] = load i64, ptr [[SWITCH_GEP]]
// CHECK-NEXT: ret i64 [[SWITCH_LOAD]]
match input % 4 {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

// CHECK: [[L1]]:
// CHECK-NOT: .{{.*}}:
// CHECK: ret
match b {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#![crate_type = "lib"]

#[no_mangle]
fn checked_div_round(a: u64, b: u64) -> Option<u64> {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it would be better to check that the IR does not have the extra undef phi input.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

At least for this case, I think so.

@DianQK DianQK force-pushed the tests-for-llvm-19 branch from 6a37129 to 272bfb9 Compare August 3, 2024 08:09
@nikic
Copy link
Contributor

nikic commented Aug 3, 2024

@bors r+ rollup=iffy

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 3, 2024

📌 Commit 272bfb9 has been approved by nikic

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 3, 2024
Comment on lines 5 to 6
// Ensure that this IR doesn't has extra undef phi input, which also guarantees that this asm
// doesn't has subsequent labels and unnecessary `jmp` instructions.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Drive-by spellchecking 😄

Suggested change
// Ensure that this IR doesn't has extra undef phi input, which also guarantees that this asm
// doesn't has subsequent labels and unnecessary `jmp` instructions.
// Ensure that this IR doesn't have extra undef phi input, which also guarantees that this asm
// doesn't have subsequent labels and unnecessary `jmp` instructions.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops, thanks!

@DianQK
Copy link
Member Author

DianQK commented Aug 3, 2024

@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Aug 3, 2024
@DianQK DianQK force-pushed the tests-for-llvm-19 branch from 272bfb9 to 3e5429e Compare August 3, 2024 12:06
@nikic
Copy link
Contributor

nikic commented Aug 3, 2024

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 3, 2024

📌 Commit 3e5429e has been approved by nikic

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Aug 3, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 4, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 3e5429e with merge df62a42...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 4, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Aug 4, 2024
@DianQK DianQK force-pushed the tests-for-llvm-19 branch from 3e5429e to 5a25b05 Compare August 4, 2024 22:16
@DianQK
Copy link
Member Author

DianQK commented Aug 4, 2024

@bors try

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2024
Add a set of tests for LLVM 19

Close rust-lang#107681. Close rust-lang#118306. Close rust-lang#126585.

r? compiler

try-job: i686-msvc
try-job: arm-android
try-job: test-various
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 4, 2024

⌛ Trying commit 5a25b05 with merge 193a169...

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 5, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#128384 (Add tests to ensure MTE tags are preserved across FFI boundaries)
 - rust-lang#128407 (Migrate `min-global-align` and `no-alloc-shim` `run-make` tests to rmake)
 - rust-lang#128584 (Add a set of tests for LLVM 19)
 - rust-lang#128636 (migrate `thumb-none-cortex-m` to rmake)
 - rust-lang#128696 (Migrate `staticlib-dylib-linkage` `run-make` test to rmake)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#128639 (migrate `thumb-none-qemu` to rmake)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

@bors r-
#128785 (comment)

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Aug 7, 2024
@DianQK
Copy link
Member Author

DianQK commented Aug 8, 2024

It appears to be caused by the ABI of i686, which should also be fixable. However, for this test, I'm not sure which is more appropriate: ignore-x86, only-64bit, or only-x86_64.

@nikic
Copy link
Contributor

nikic commented Aug 8, 2024

I'd go back to the original version without no-jump-table and only-x86_64.

@DianQK DianQK force-pushed the tests-for-llvm-19 branch from d432330 to 6251df7 Compare August 8, 2024 10:06
@DianQK DianQK force-pushed the tests-for-llvm-19 branch from 6251df7 to b5c453d Compare August 8, 2024 10:08
@DianQK
Copy link
Member Author

DianQK commented Aug 8, 2024

@nikic
Copy link
Contributor

nikic commented Aug 8, 2024

@bors r+ rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 8, 2024

📌 Commit b5c453d has been approved by nikic

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Aug 8, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 9, 2024

⌛ Testing commit b5c453d with merge c80d992...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job dist-apple-various failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 9, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Aug 9, 2024
@DianQK
Copy link
Member Author

DianQK commented Aug 9, 2024

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 9, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 10, 2024

⌛ Testing commit b5c453d with merge 69b380d...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 10, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: nikic
Pushing 69b380d to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Aug 10, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 69b380d into rust-lang:master Aug 10, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.82.0 milestone Aug 10, 2024
@DianQK DianQK deleted the tests-for-llvm-19 branch August 10, 2024 05:06
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (69b380d): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

Results (secondary 5.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
5.1% [3.3%, 6.0%] 8
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 762.964s -> 763.399s (0.06%)
Artifact size: 339.32 MiB -> 339.30 MiB (-0.01%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
9 participants