-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove try_from_lit
from from_anon_const
#128715
Conversation
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Remove `try_from_lit` from `from_anon_const` This PR tries to fix rust-lang#116308. TODO: - [ ] write up the reason why `try_from_lit` should be removed from `from_anon_const` - [ ] write up the reason why it is safe to do this - [ ] do a perf run and see if doing this affect performance ui tests changes: - [ ] failed run-pass/check-pass (`const-arg-in-const-arg.rs#full`, `abstract-const-as-cast-4.rs`, `no_dependence.rs`, `issue-94293.rs`) - [ ] symbol mangling affected (`symbol-names/*`) - [ ] different error report (`const-projection-err.rs#gce`, `abstract-const-as-cast-3.rs`, `type_mismatch.rs`) - [x] misc - error report reordering - same error, but different const type reprs This PR is related to two unstable features (`adt_const_params`: rust-lang#95174, `generic_const_exprs`: rust-lang#76560). r? `@BoxyUwU`
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Finished benchmarking commit (e852e36): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDEDBenchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @bors rollup=never Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary 264.6%, secondary 0.9%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResults (primary 470.4%, secondary 13.8%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeResults (primary -0.1%, secondary -0.6%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Bootstrap: 759.636s -> 762.742s (0.41%) |
Closed due to dramatic performance lost. We could next try remove the delayed bug inside |
This PR tries to fix #116308.
TODO:
try_from_lit
should be removed fromfrom_anon_const
ui tests changes:
const-arg-in-const-arg.rs#full
,abstract-const-as-cast-4.rs
,no_dependence.rs
,issue-94293.rs
)symbol-names/*
)const-projection-err.rs#gce
,abstract-const-as-cast-3.rs
,type_mismatch.rs
)This PR is related to two unstable features (
adt_const_params
: #95174,generic_const_exprs
: #76560). r? @BoxyUwU