Rollup of 2 pull requests #128811
Closed
Rollup of 2 pull requests #128811
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some `const { }` asserts for rust-lang#128200
The correctness of code in rust-lang#128200 relies on an array being sorted (so that it can be used in binary search later), which is currently enforced with `// tidy-alphabetical` (and characters being written in `\u{XXXX}` form), as well as lack of duplicate entries with conflicting keys, which is not currently enforced.
This PR changes it to using a `const{ }` assertion (and also checks for duplicate entries). Sadly, we cannot use the recently-stabilized `is_sorted_by_key` here, because it is not const (but it would not allow us to check for uniqueness anyways). Instead, let's write a manual loop.
Alternative approach (perfect hash function): rust-lang#128463
r? `@ghost`
… r=jieyouxu Update E0517 message to reflect RFC 2195. E0517 occurs when a `#[repr(..)]` attribute is placed on an unsupported item. Currently, the explanation of the error implies that `#[repr(u*/i*)]` cannot be placed on fieldful enums, which is no longer the case since [RFC 2195](rust-lang/rfcs#2195) was [stabilized](rust-lang#60553), which allows placing `#[repr(u*/i*)]` and/or `#[repr(C)]` on fieldful enums to produce a defined layout. This PR doesn't (currently) add a description of the semantics of placing `#[repr(u*/i*)]` on a fieldful enum to the error explanation, it just removes the claims/implications that it is not allowed.
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=2 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 2 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#128465 (Some `const { }` asserts for rust-lang#128200 ) - rust-lang#128795 (Update E0517 message to reflect RFC 2195.) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
const { }asserts for #128200 #128465 (Someconst { }asserts for Change output normalization logic to be linear against size of output #128200 )r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup