Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-enable more debuginfo tests on freebsd #128990

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 16, 2024

Conversation

saethlin
Copy link
Member

@saethlin saethlin commented Aug 11, 2024

These ignores are ancient, we don't run freebsd tests in CI, and even if we did they'd probably pass because the test suite passes with the latest gdb release on Linux.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 11, 2024
@saethlin
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2024
…<try>

Re-enable debuginfo tests on freebsd

r? `@ghost`

try-job: dist-various-2
try-job: dist-x86_64-freebsd
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 11, 2024

⌛ Trying commit 1766d85 with merge 6ca5a7b...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 11, 2024

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 6ca5a7b (6ca5a7b5807707620729b71cb5350ac6ffd71bb3)

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Aug 12, 2024

Same here, these two runners don't actually run any tests. In fact I don't think that we even run any tests for FreeBSD, as it's not a tier 1 target.

@saethlin
Copy link
Member Author

Well I think the freebsd comment dates back to #23310 so I think removing the ignores anyway is the right move. We don't have a target maintainer listed for any freebsd targets anyway, so I don't see any other way these ignores would get removed.

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Aug 13, 2024

Yeah, I think we can remove the ignores. I just wanted to point out that the tests don't actually run, because from the PR description it seemed to me like you thought they do.

@saethlin
Copy link
Member Author

from the PR description it seemed to me like you thought they do.

I definitely did. I should probably check all the other targets.

@saethlin saethlin force-pushed the freebsd-debuginfo-tests branch from 1766d85 to c6815c0 Compare August 16, 2024 14:37
@saethlin saethlin changed the title Re-enable debuginfo tests on freebsd Re-enable more debuginfo tests on freebsd Aug 16, 2024
@saethlin saethlin marked this pull request as ready for review August 16, 2024 15:06
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 16, 2024

📌 Commit c6815c0 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 16, 2024
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2024
…r=compiler-errors

Re-enable more debuginfo tests on freebsd

These ignores are _ancient_, we don't run freebsd tests in CI, and even if we did they'd probably pass because the test suite passes with the latest gdb release on Linux.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 3 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#128598 (float to/from bits and classify: update for float semantics RFC)
 - rust-lang#128990 (Re-enable more debuginfo tests on freebsd)
 - rust-lang#129042 (Special-case alias ty during the delayed bug emission in `try_from_lit`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#128990 (Re-enable more debuginfo tests on freebsd)
 - rust-lang#129042 (Special-case alias ty during the delayed bug emission in `try_from_lit`)
 - rust-lang#129086 (Stabilize `is_none_or`)
 - rust-lang#129149 (Migrate `validate_json.py` script to rust in `run-make/rustdoc-map-file` test)
 - rust-lang#129154 (Fix wrong source location for some incorrect macro definitions)
 - rust-lang#129161 (Stabilize std::thread::Builder::spawn_unchecked)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 19d32e4 into rust-lang:master Aug 16, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.82.0 milestone Aug 16, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#128990 - saethlin:freebsd-debuginfo-tests, r=compiler-errors

Re-enable more debuginfo tests on freebsd

These ignores are _ancient_, we don't run freebsd tests in CI, and even if we did they'd probably pass because the test suite passes with the latest gdb release on Linux.
@saethlin saethlin deleted the freebsd-debuginfo-tests branch August 16, 2024 22:48
@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

Bors is not correctly removing items from the queue

@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Aug 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants