Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 7 pull requests #129012

Closed
wants to merge 26 commits into from

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

joboet and others added 26 commits August 4, 2024 18:39
This PR makes a number of changes to the UNIX randomness implementation:
* Use `io::Error` for centralized error handling
* Move the file-fallback logic out of the `getrandom`-specific module
* Stop redefining the syscalls on macOS and DragonFly, they have appeared in `libc`
* Add a `OnceLock` to cache the random device file descriptor
…gers.

Line numbers of multiply-inlined functions were fixed in rust-lang#114643 by using a
single DISubprogram. That, however, triggered assertions because parameters
weren't deduplicated. The "solution" to that in rust-lang#115417 was to insert a
DILexicalScope below the DISubprogram and parent all of the parameters to that
scope. That fixed the assertion, but debuggers (including gdb and lldb) don't
recognize variables that are not parented to the subprogram itself as parameters,
even if they are emitted with DW_TAG_formal_parameter.

Consider the program:

use std::env;

fn square(n: i32) -> i32 {
    n * n
}

fn square_no_inline(n: i32) -> i32 {
    n * n
}

fn main() {
    let x = square(env::vars().count() as i32);
    let y = square_no_inline(env::vars().count() as i32);
    println!("{x} == {y}");
}

When making a release build with debug=2 and rustc 1.82.0-nightly (8b38707 2024-08-07)

(gdb) r
Starting program: /ephemeral/tmp/target/release/tmp
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".

Breakpoint 1, tmp::square () at src/main.rs:5
5	    n * n
(gdb) info args
No arguments.
(gdb) info locals
n = 31
(gdb) c
Continuing.

Breakpoint 2, tmp::square_no_inline (n=31) at src/main.rs:10
10	    n * n
(gdb) info args
n = 31
(gdb) info locals
No locals.

This issue is particularly annoying because it removes arguments from stack traces.

The DWARF for the inlined function looks like this:

< 2><0x00002132 GOFF=0x00002132>      DW_TAG_subprogram
                                        DW_AT_linkage_name          _ZN3tmp6square17hc507052ff3d2a488E
                                        DW_AT_name                  square
                                        DW_AT_decl_file             0x0000000f /ephemeral/tmp/src/main.rs
                                        DW_AT_decl_line             0x00000004
                                        DW_AT_type                  0x00001a56<.debug_info+0x00001a56>
                                        DW_AT_inline                DW_INL_inlined
< 3><0x00002142 GOFF=0x00002142>        DW_TAG_lexical_block
< 4><0x00002143 GOFF=0x00002143>          DW_TAG_formal_parameter
                                            DW_AT_name                  n
                                            DW_AT_decl_file             0x0000000f /ephemeral/tmp/src/main.rs
                                            DW_AT_decl_line             0x00000004
                                            DW_AT_type                  0x00001a56<.debug_info+0x00001a56>
< 4><0x0000214e GOFF=0x0000214e>          DW_TAG_null
< 3><0x0000214f GOFF=0x0000214f>        DW_TAG_null

That DW_TAG_lexical_block inhibits every debugger I've tested from recognizing
'n' as a parameter.

This patch removes the additional lexical scope. Parameters can be easily
deduplicated by a tuple of their scope and the argument index, at the trivial
cost of taking a Hash + Eq bound on DIScope.
Co-authored-by: Georg Semmler <github@weiznich.de>
also make it fail if there's a compression issue
zlib is seemingly always enabled, so we can test it unconditionally
it now checks zlib and zstd, via rustc and rust-lld
move it where it's used, and name it like the other scripts
…Denton

std: refactor UNIX random data generation

This PR makes a number of changes to the UNIX randomness implementation:
* Use `io::Error` for centralized error handling
* Move the file-fallback logic out of the `getrandom`-specific module
* Stop redefining the syscalls on macOS and DragonFly, they have appeared in `libc`
* Add a `OnceLock` to cache the random device file descriptor
…, r=lcnr

Normalize struct tail properly for `dyn` ptr-to-ptr casting in new solver

Realized that the new solver didn't handle ptr-to-ptr casting correctly.

r? lcnr

Built on rust-lang#128694
…ginfo, r=wesleywiser

Rework MIR inlining debuginfo so function parameters show up in debuggers.

Line numbers of multiply-inlined functions were fixed in rust-lang#114643 by using a single DISubprogram. That, however, triggered assertions because parameters weren't deduplicated. The "solution" to that in rust-lang#115417 was to insert a DILexicalScope below the DISubprogram and parent all of the parameters to that scope. That fixed the assertion, but debuggers (including gdb and lldb) don't recognize variables that are not parented to the subprogram itself as parameters, even if they are emitted with DW_TAG_formal_parameter.

Consider the program:

```rust
use std::env;

#[inline(always)]
fn square(n: i32) -> i32 {
    n * n
}

#[inline(never)]
fn square_no_inline(n: i32) -> i32 {
    n * n
}

fn main() {
    let x = square(env::vars().count() as i32);
    let y = square_no_inline(env::vars().count() as i32);
    println!("{x} == {y}");
}
```

When making a release build with debug=2 and rustc 1.82.0-nightly (8b38707 2024-08-07)

```
(gdb) r
Starting program: /ephemeral/tmp/target/release/tmp [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".

Breakpoint 1, tmp::square () at src/main.rs:5
5	    n * n
(gdb) info args
No arguments.
(gdb) info locals
n = 31
(gdb) c
Continuing.

Breakpoint 2, tmp::square_no_inline (n=31) at src/main.rs:10
10	    n * n
(gdb) info args
n = 31
(gdb) info locals
No locals.
```

This issue is particularly annoying because it removes arguments from stack traces.

The DWARF for the inlined function looks like this:

```
< 2><0x00002132 GOFF=0x00002132>      DW_TAG_subprogram
                                        DW_AT_linkage_name          _ZN3tmp6square17hc507052ff3d2a488E
                                        DW_AT_name                  square
                                        DW_AT_decl_file             0x0000000f /ephemeral/tmp/src/main.rs
                                        DW_AT_decl_line             0x00000004
                                        DW_AT_type                  0x00001a56<.debug_info+0x00001a56>
                                        DW_AT_inline                DW_INL_inlined
< 3><0x00002142 GOFF=0x00002142>        DW_TAG_lexical_block
< 4><0x00002143 GOFF=0x00002143>          DW_TAG_formal_parameter
                                            DW_AT_name                  n
                                            DW_AT_decl_file             0x0000000f /ephemeral/tmp/src/main.rs
                                            DW_AT_decl_line             0x00000004
                                            DW_AT_type                  0x00001a56<.debug_info+0x00001a56>
< 4><0x0000214e GOFF=0x0000214e>          DW_TAG_null
< 3><0x0000214f GOFF=0x0000214f>        DW_TAG_null
```

That DW_TAG_lexical_block inhibits every debugger I've tested from recognizing 'n' as a parameter.

This patch removes the additional lexical scope. Parameters can be easily deduplicated by a tuple of their scope and the argument index, at the trivial cost of taking a Hash + Eq bound on DIScope.
…k-Simulacrum

Add windows-targets crate to std's sysroot

With this PR, when backtrace is used as a crate from crates.io it will (once updated) use the real [windows-targets](https://crates.io/crates/windows-targets) crate. But when used from std it'll use std's replacement version.

This allows sharing our customized `windows_tagets::link!` macro between std proper and the backtrace crate when used as part of std, ensuring a consistent linking story. This will be especially important once we move to using [`raw-dylib`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/external-blocks.html#dylib-versus-raw-dylib) by default.
…mpl, r=lcnr

Store `do_not_recommend`-ness in impl header

Alternative to rust-lang#128674

It's less flexible, but also less invasive. Hopefully it's also performant. I'd recommend we think separately about the design for how to gate arbitrary diagnostic attributes moving forward.
More work on `zstd` compression

r? `@Kobzol` as we've discussed this.

This is a draft to show the current approach of supporting zstd in compiletest, and making the tests using it unconditional.

Knowing whether llvm/lld was built with `LLVM_ENABLE_ZSTD` is quite hard, so there are two strategies. There are details in the code, and we can discuss this approach. Until we know the config used to build CI artifacts, it seems our options are somewhat limited in any case.

zlib compression seems always enabled, so we only check this in its dedicated test, allowing the test to ignore errors due to zstd not being supported.

The zstd test is made unconditional in what it tests, by relying on `needs-llvm-zstd` to be ignored when `llvm.libzstd` isn't enabled in `config.toml`.

try-job: x86_64-gnu
…nur-ozkan

bootstrap: clear miri ui-test deps when miri sysroot gets rebuilt

Second attempt after rust-lang#128683: seems like it's not the compiler changing that we care about, but the sysroot changing.

I did some local testing with sysroot rebuilds and it works fine for at least those cases I checked.

r? `@onur-ozkan`
@rustbot rustbot added A-run-make Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc O-unix Operating system: Unix-like O-windows Operating system: Windows labels Aug 12, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver) rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Aug 12, 2024
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=7

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 12, 2024

📌 Commit 23cf189 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 12, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 12, 2024

🔒 Merge conflict

This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again.

How do I rebase?

Assuming self is your fork and upstream is this repository, you can resolve the conflict following these steps:

  1. git checkout rollup-kh9k38p (switch to your branch)
  2. git fetch upstream master (retrieve the latest master)
  3. git rebase upstream/master -p (rebase on top of it)
  4. Follow the on-screen instruction to resolve conflicts (check git status if you got lost).
  5. git push self rollup-kh9k38p --force-with-lease (update this PR)

You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial.

Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses git merge instead of git rebase which makes the PR commit history more difficult to read.

Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Cargo.lock conflict is handled during merge and rebase. This is normal, and you should still perform step 5 to update this PR.

Error message
CONFLICT (modify/delete): tests/run-make/rust-lld-compress-debug-sections/rmake.rs deleted in heads/homu-tmp and modified in HEAD. Version HEAD of tests/run-make/rust-lld-compress-debug-sections/rmake.rs left in tree.
Auto-merging tests/run-make/compressed-debuginfo/rmake.rs
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in tests/run-make/compressed-debuginfo/rmake.rs
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Aug 12, 2024
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-kh9k38p branch September 1, 2024 17:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-run-make Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc O-unix Operating system: Unix-like O-windows Operating system: Windows rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants