-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
make the const-unstable-in-stable error more clear #129818
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Aug 31, 2024
Yep, this makes sense. Presence of |
r? compiler-errors @bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Aug 31, 2024
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 31, 2024
…er-errors make the const-unstable-in-stable error more clear The default should be to add `rustc_const_unstable`, not `rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable`. Also I discovered our check for missing const stability attributes on stable functions -- but strangely that check only kicks in for "reachable" functions. `check_missing_stability` checks for reachability since all reachable functions must have a stability attribute, but I would say if a function has `#[stable]` it should also have const-stability attributes regardless of reachability.
This was referenced Aug 31, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 31, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#128523 (Add release notes for 1.81.0) - rust-lang#129605 (Add missing `needs-llvm-components` directives for run-make tests that need target-specific codegen) - rust-lang#129650 (Clean up `library/profiler_builtins/build.rs`) - rust-lang#129651 (skip stage 0 target check if `BOOTSTRAP_SKIP_TARGET_SANITY` is set) - rust-lang#129684 (Enable Miri to pass pointers through FFI) - rust-lang#129762 (Update the `wasm-component-ld` binary dependency) - rust-lang#129782 (couple more crash tests) - rust-lang#129816 (tidy: say which feature gate has a stability issue mismatch) - rust-lang#129818 (make the const-unstable-in-stable error more clear) - rust-lang#129824 (Fix code examples buttons not appearing on click on mobile) - rust-lang#129826 (library: Fix typo in `core::mem`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 31, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#128523 (Add release notes for 1.81.0) - rust-lang#129605 (Add missing `needs-llvm-components` directives for run-make tests that need target-specific codegen) - rust-lang#129650 (Clean up `library/profiler_builtins/build.rs`) - rust-lang#129651 (skip stage 0 target check if `BOOTSTRAP_SKIP_TARGET_SANITY` is set) - rust-lang#129684 (Enable Miri to pass pointers through FFI) - rust-lang#129762 (Update the `wasm-component-ld` binary dependency) - rust-lang#129782 (couple more crash tests) - rust-lang#129816 (tidy: say which feature gate has a stability issue mismatch) - rust-lang#129818 (make the const-unstable-in-stable error more clear) - rust-lang#129824 (Fix code examples buttons not appearing on click on mobile) - rust-lang#129826 (library: Fix typo in `core::mem`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 31, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#129818 - RalfJung:const-stability, r=compiler-errors make the const-unstable-in-stable error more clear The default should be to add `rustc_const_unstable`, not `rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable`. Also I discovered our check for missing const stability attributes on stable functions -- but strangely that check only kicks in for "reachable" functions. `check_missing_stability` checks for reachability since all reachable functions must have a stability attribute, but I would say if a function has `#[stable]` it should also have const-stability attributes regardless of reachability.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The default should be to add
rustc_const_unstable
, notrustc_allow_const_fn_unstable
.Also I discovered our check for missing const stability attributes on stable functions -- but strangely that check only kicks in for "reachable" functions.
check_missing_stability
checks for reachability since all reachable functions must have a stability attribute, but I would say if a function has#[stable]
it should also have const-stability attributes regardless of reachability.