-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 10 pull requests #129978
Rollup of 10 pull requests #129978
Conversation
This commit adds the headers for the top level documentation to rustdoc's existing table of contents, along with associated items. It only show two levels of headers. Going further would require the sidebar to be wider, and that seems unnecessary (the crates that have manually-built TOCs usually don't need deeply nested headers).
The main `arbitrary_self_types` feature gate will shortly be reused for a new version of arbitrary self types which we are amending per [this RFC](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/3519-arbitrary-self-types-v2.md). The main amendments are: * _do_ support `self` types which can't safely implement `Deref` * do _not_ support generic `self` types * do _not_ support raw pointers as `self` types. This PR relates to the last of those bullet points: this strips pointer support from the current `arbitrary_self_types` feature. We expect this to cause some amount of breakage for crates using this unstable feature to allow raw pointer self types. If that's the case, we want to know about it, and we want crate authors to know of the upcoming changes. For now, this can be resolved by adding the new `arbitrary_self_types_pointers` feature to such crates. If we determine that use of raw pointers as self types is common, then we may maintain that as an unstable feature even if we come to stabilize the rest of the `arbitrary_self_types` support in future. If we don't hear that this PR is causing breakage, then perhaps we don't need it at all, even behind an unstable feature gate. [Tracking issue](rust-lang#44874) This is [step 4 of the plan outlined here](rust-lang#44874 (comment))
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Apparently tools like `rustfmt` require it in order to find the right `librustc_driver.so` without extra tweaks. Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
This change will also remove the current warnings in the build due to `rustfmt` not being available (for `bindgen` output): error: 'rustfmt' is not installed for the custom toolchain 'local'. note: this is a custom toolchain, which cannot use `rustup component add` help: if you built this toolchain from source, and used `rustup toolchain link`, then you may be able to build the component with `x.py` Failed to run rustfmt: Internal rustfmt error (non-fatal, continuing) Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
This particular target does not expand into much code, so it is a good first candidate to see if we could keep this in the CI. Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
It will make it easier to add more in the future. Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
…layout Additionally teach compiletest to ignore tests that rely on deterministic layout. Tests themselves aren't built with randomization but they can still observe slight changes in std or rustc
Per the `waker_getters` FCP: rust-lang#96992 (comment)
Per the `waker_getters` FCP: rust-lang#96992 (comment) Docs largely copied from `RawWaker::new`.
@bors r+ rollup=never p=13 |
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#101339 (enable -Zrandomize-layout in debug CI builds ) - rust-lang#120736 (rustdoc: add header map to the table of contents) - rust-lang#127021 (Add target support for RTEMS Arm) - rust-lang#128928 (CI: rfl: add more tools and steps) - rust-lang#129584 (warn the user if the upstream master branch is old) - rust-lang#129664 (Arbitrary self types v2: pointers feature gate.) - rust-lang#129752 (Make supertrait and implied predicates queries defaulted) - rust-lang#129918 (Update docs of `missing_abi` lint) - rust-lang#129919 (Stabilize `waker_getters`) - rust-lang#129925 (remove deprecated option `rust.split-debuginfo`) Failed merges: - rust-lang#129789 (rustdoc: use strategic boxing to shrink `clean::Item`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
@bors retry |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 009e73825a In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
Finished benchmarking commit (eb33b43): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - BENCHMARK(S) FAILEDNext Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression ❗ ❗ ❗ ❗ ❗
❗ ❗ ❗ ❗ ❗ cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (secondary -1.5%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResults (secondary 2.8%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeResults (primary -0.3%, secondary -0.0%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Bootstrap: missing data |
last message in https://perf.rust-lang.org/status.html is
|
The regressions here are small enough that I don't think it's worth investigating further. @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged |
Successful merges:
missing_abi
lint #129918 (Update docs ofmissing_abi
lint)waker_getters
#129919 (Stabilizewaker_getters
)rust.split-debuginfo
#129925 (remove deprecated optionrust.split-debuginfo
)Failed merges:
clean::Item
#129789 (rustdoc: use strategic boxing to shrinkclean::Item
)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup