Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Register snapshots. Convert most code to new inner attribute syntax. #13068

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

brson
Copy link
Contributor

@brson brson commented Mar 22, 2014

This exposes issue #13067, in which the new inner attribute syntax
is incompatible with macro_rules! attr matchers. I had to 'ignore'
compile-fail/macro-inner-attributes.

This exposes issue rust-lang#13067, in which the new inner attribute syntax
is incompatible with macro_rules! `attr` matchers. I had to 'ignore'
compile-fail/macro-inner-attributes.
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Do we want to wait for a resolution to #13067? Just in case it impacts this decision.

@brson
Copy link
Contributor Author

brson commented Mar 24, 2014

We got another snapshot over the weekend, so I'm going to close this.

@brson brson closed this Mar 24, 2014
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

We decided in today's meeting to move forward with the breakage of $foo:attr for now, perhaps this could be reopened for the syntax migration?

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2014
This is the rebasing of #13068 with a fix for #13067 as the first commit.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 29, 2014
This is the rebasing of #13068 with a fix for #13067 as the first commit.
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2024
Rework `init_numbered_fields`

Two behaviour changes:
* Not linting in macros
* Not linting when side effects might be reordered

changelog: `init_numbered_fields`: Don't suggest reordering side effects.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants