Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 8 pull requests #131624

Closed
wants to merge 17 commits into from

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

tdittr and others added 17 commits September 23, 2024 14:04
This check was previously only performed on functions not function pointers.

Co-authored-by: Folkert <folkert@folkertdev.nl>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
These are common pitfalls for beginners, so I think it's worth
making the subtleties more visible.
…eatures

Add missing error annotations and .stderr file

Acknowledge comments
…iler-errors

Check ABI target compatibility for function pointers

Tracking issue: rust-lang#130260
Related tracking issue: rust-lang#87678

Compatibility of an ABI for a target was previously only performed on function definitions and `extern` blocks. This PR adds it also to function pointers to be consistent.

This might have broken some of the `tests/ui/` depending on the platform, so a try run seems like a good idea.

Also this might break existing code, because we now emit extra errors. Does this require a crater run?

# Example
```rust
// build with: --target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

// These raise E0570
extern "thiscall" fn foo() {}
extern "thiscall" { fn bar() }

// This did not raise any error
fn baz(f: extern "thiscall" fn()) { f() }
```

# Open Questions
* [x] Should this report a future incompatibility warning like rust-lang#87678 ?
* [ ] Is this the best place to perform the check?
…c, r=Mark-Simulacrum

make `Step` doc-comments more clear

Aiming to improve complicated `Step` documentation. Once we merge this, I will update [this page](https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/building/bootstrapping/how-bootstrap-does-it.html?highlight=Step#synopsis-of--step) too.
…lcnr

Don't assume traits used as type are trait objs in 2021 edition

Fixes rust-lang#127548

When you use a trait as a type, the compiler automatically assumes you meant to use a trait object, which is not always the case.
This PR fixes the bug where you don't need a trait object, so the error message was changed to:
```
error[E0782]: expected a type, found a trait
```
Also fixes some ICEs:
Fixes rust-lang#120241
Fixes rust-lang#120482
Fixes rust-lang#125512
…y-instability-lint-for-clippy, r=xFrednet

Handle `clippy` cases of `rustc::potential_query_instability` lint

This PR removes `#![allow(rustc::potential_query_instability)]` line from [`src/tools/clippy/clippy_lints/src/lib.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/tools/clippy/clippy_lints/src/lib.rs#L30) and converts `FxHash{Map,Set}` types into `FxIndex{Map,Set}` to suppress lint errors.

A somewhat tracking issue: rust-lang#84447
…=Mark-Simulacrum

More clearly document Stdin::read_line

These are common pitfalls for beginners, so I think it's worth making the subtleties more visible.
…ccepted-features, r=jieyouxu

Emit an error for unstable attributes that reference already stable features

Closes rust-lang#129814
merge const_ipv4 / const_ipv6 feature gate into 'ip' feature gate

rust-lang#76205 has been closed a while ago, but there are still some functions that reference it. Those functions are all unstable *and* const-unstable. There's no good reason to use a separate feature gate for their const-stability, so this PR moves their const-stability under the same gate as their regular stability, and therefore removes the remaining references to rust-lang#76205.
…tgross35

remove const_cow_is_borrowed feature gate

The two functions guarded by this are still unstable, and there's no reason to require a separate feature gate for their const-ness -- we can just have `cow_is_borrowed` cover both kinds of stability.

Cc rust-lang#65143
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Oct 12, 2024
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=8

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 12, 2024

📌 Commit 1787b68 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 12, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 12, 2024

🔒 Merge conflict

This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again.

How do I rebase?

Assuming self is your fork and upstream is this repository, you can resolve the conflict following these steps:

  1. git checkout rollup-sq1awa8 (switch to your branch)
  2. git fetch upstream master (retrieve the latest master)
  3. git rebase upstream/master -p (rebase on top of it)
  4. Follow the on-screen instruction to resolve conflicts (check git status if you got lost).
  5. git push self rollup-sq1awa8 --force-with-lease (update this PR)

You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial.

Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses git merge instead of git rebase which makes the PR commit history more difficult to read.

Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Cargo.lock conflict is handled during merge and rebase. This is normal, and you should still perform step 5 to update this PR.

Error message
Removing tests/crashes/125512.rs
Removing tests/crashes/120482.rs
Removing tests/crashes/120241.rs
Removing tests/crashes/120241-2.rs
Auto-merging library/core/tests/lib.rs
Auto-merging library/core/src/lib.rs
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in library/core/src/lib.rs
Auto-merging library/alloc/tests/lib.rs
Auto-merging library/alloc/src/lib.rs
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Oct 12, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 12, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #131612) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants