Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rustdoc book: Move --test-builder(--wrapper)? docs to unstable section. #133191

Conversation

aDotInTheVoid
Copy link
Member

Tracking issue: #102981

These have always been unstable, but were documented in the stable section in #114651

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 18, 2024

r? @fmease

rustbot has assigned @fmease.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 18, 2024
@fmease
Copy link
Member

fmease commented Nov 18, 2024

Thanks, good catch! @bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 18, 2024

📌 Commit ed465f2 has been approved by fmease

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 18, 2024
fmease added a commit to fmease/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
…=fmease

RELEASES.md: Don't document unstable `--test-build-wrapper`

rust-lang#114651 added this as an unstable flag, so it doesn't make sense to go in the release notes.

Discovered while working on rust-lang#133191.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#132758 (Improve `{BTreeMap,HashMap}::get_key_value` docs.)
 - rust-lang#133180 ([rustdoc] Fix items with generics not having their jump to def link generated)
 - rust-lang#133181 (Update books)
 - rust-lang#133182 (const_panic: inline in bootstrap builds to avoid f16/f128 crashes)
 - rust-lang#133185 (rustdoc-search: use smart binary search in bitmaps)
 - rust-lang#133186 (Document s390x-unknown-linux targets)
 - rust-lang#133187 (Add reference annotations for diagnostic attributes)
 - rust-lang#133191 (rustdoc book: Move `--test-builder(--wrapper)?` docs to unstable section.)
 - rust-lang#133192 (RELEASES.md: Don't document unstable `--test-build-wrapper`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 27acd5e into rust-lang:master Nov 19, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.84.0 milestone Nov 19, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#133192 - aDotInTheVoid:changelog-cleanup, r=fmease

RELEASES.md: Don't document unstable `--test-build-wrapper`

rust-lang#114651 added this as an unstable flag, so it doesn't make sense to go in the release notes.

Discovered while working on rust-lang#133191.
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#133191 - aDotInTheVoid:whoops-thats-not-stable-and-might-never-be, r=fmease

rustdoc book: Move `--test-builder(--wrapper)?` docs to unstable section.

Tracking issue: rust-lang#102981

These have always been unstable, but were documented in the stable section in rust-lang#114651
@aDotInTheVoid aDotInTheVoid deleted the whoops-thats-not-stable-and-might-never-be branch November 19, 2024 09:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants