bump compiler and tools to windows 0.59, bootstrap to 0.57

[klensy]

This bumps compiler and tools to windows 0.59 (temporary dupes version, as sysinfo still depend on <= 0.57).
Bootstrap bumps only to 0.57 (the same sysinfo dep).

This additionally resolves my comment #130874 (comment)

Will work on it in follow up pr: There still some sus imports for rustc_driver.dll like ws2_32 or RoOriginateErrorW, but i will look at them later.

[rustbot]

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[rustbot]

Some changes occurred in src/tools/compiletest

cc @jieyouxu

These commits modify the Cargo.lock file. Unintentional changes to Cargo.lock can be introduced when switching branches and rebasing PRs.

If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged.
Otherwise, you can ignore this comment.

[rustbot]

The list of allowed third-party dependencies may have been modified! You must ensure that any new dependencies have compatible licenses before merging.

cc @davidtwco, @wesleywiser

[klensy]

Okay, RoOriginateErrorW can be removed with microsoft/windows-rs#3126 and cfg windows_slim_errors

As for ws2_32, maybe after #122362?

[Mark-Simulacrum]

There still some sus imports for rustc_driver.dll like ws2_32 or RoOriginateErrorW, but i will look at them later.

Do you have more context you can share on this? Is this something we should block merging on perhaps? The changes in this PR look fine to me, but this seems at least good to either drop from the PR description (if not actually relevant here?) or rephrase (e.g., pointing to some issue for follow-up work)...

[klensy]

There still some sus imports for rustc_driver.dll like ws2_32 or RoOriginateErrorW, but i will look at them later.

Do you have more context you can share on this? Is this something we should block merging on perhaps? The changes in this PR look fine to me, but this seems at least good to either drop from the PR description (if not actually relevant here?) or rephrase (e.g., pointing to some issue for follow-up work)...

No, this pr ready to review and merge, added note that will work on other imports in followup pr.

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit 6aeaa94 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[jieyouxu]

@bors rollup=iffy (dep bumps)

[klensy]

Rebased, other dep updates broken Cargo.lock for this one.

[jieyouxu]

Thanks

[jieyouxu]

@bors r=@Mark-Simulacrum

[bors]

📌 Commit 6c5f084 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 6c5f084 with merge a24bdc6...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing a24bdc6 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (a24bdc6): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -2.8%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.8%	[-4.0%, -1.4%]	5
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results (secondary -3.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.1%	[-3.5%, -2.6%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 765.516s -> 763.897s (-0.21%)
Artifact size: 326.01 MiB -> 325.99 MiB (-0.01%)

[klensy]

Why bump of windows-only deps (of compiler and bootstrap) changes binary size of linux artifacts? https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=ed43cbcb882e7c06870abdd9305dc1f17eb9bab9&end=a24bdc60ce8b54ff5610793e8527eea84ce6fb6f&stat=size%3Alinked_artifact&nonRelevant=true&showRawData=true Weird.