Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: use windows 2025 for i686-mingw #136150

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2025

Conversation

marcoieni
Copy link
Member

Lately, the flakiness of the job i686-mingw increased.
In #135632 windows 2025 helped decrease the flakiness so we want to try to do the same here.

try-job: i686-mingw

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 27, 2025

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 27, 2025
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2025
…try>

ci: use windows 2025 for i686-mingw

try-job: i686-mingw
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 27, 2025

⌛ Trying commit 6394069 with merge c181a94...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 28, 2025

💥 Test timed out

@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 28, 2025

⌛ Trying commit 6394069 with merge 151b82c...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2025
…try>

ci: use windows 2025 for i686-mingw

try-job: i686-mingw
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 28, 2025

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 28, 2025
@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

I only created the windows large runner on the rust-lang org. I will now create it for rust-lang-ci org as well

@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 28, 2025

⌛ Trying commit 6394069 with merge 4e4a567...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2025
…try>

ci: use windows 2025 for i686-mingw

try-job: i686-mingw
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 28, 2025

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 4e4a567 (4e4a567b10bf243a5c59bb2bdb048e99c904b0c6)

@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2025
…try>

ci: use windows 2025 for i686-mingw

try-job: i686-mingw
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 28, 2025

⌛ Trying commit 6394069 with merge 5444a47...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 28, 2025

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 5444a47 (5444a472b526ffb01791d1954df34763a47307a0)

@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 28, 2025

⌛ Trying commit 6394069 with merge 3ec2aba...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2025
…try>

ci: use windows 2025 for i686-mingw

try-job: i686-mingw
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 28, 2025

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 3ec2aba (3ec2aba21880917a6b0707126637be0b9eba6a98)

@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 28, 2025

⌛ Trying commit 6394069 with merge c0c74c9...

@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2025
…try>

ci: use windows 2025 for i686-mingw

try-job: i686-mingw
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 29, 2025

⌛ Trying commit 6394069 with merge 53b9f18...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 29, 2025

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 53b9f18 (53b9f1881cee95cc24f99f8081b627652d2ecedd)

@marcoieni marcoieni marked this pull request as ready for review January 29, 2025 10:13
@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Jan 29, 2025

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 29, 2025

📌 Commit 6394069 has been approved by Kobzol

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jan 29, 2025
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2025
…=Kobzol

ci: use windows 2025 for i686-mingw

try-job: i686-mingw
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 29, 2025

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #136248) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jan 29, 2025
@rustbot rustbot added the has-merge-commits PR has merge commits, merge with caution. label Jan 29, 2025
@rustbot

This comment has been minimized.

@marcoieni marcoieni force-pushed the windows-25-i686-mingw branch from 0756de1 to aeabd4b Compare January 29, 2025 20:27
@rustbot rustbot removed the has-merge-commits PR has merge commits, merge with caution. label Jan 29, 2025
@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

I solved the merge conflicts, probably this needs to be approved again

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Jan 29, 2025

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 29, 2025

📌 Commit aeabd4b has been approved by Kobzol

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jan 29, 2025
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#135414 (Stabilize `const_black_box`)
 - rust-lang#136150 (ci: use windows 2025 for i686-mingw)
 - rust-lang#136258 (rustdoc: rename `issue-\d+.rs` tests to have meaningful names (part 11))
 - rust-lang#136270 (Remove `NamedVarMap`.)
 - rust-lang#136278 (add constraint graph to polonius MIR dump)
 - rust-lang#136287 (LLVM changed the nocapture attribute to captures(none))
 - rust-lang#136291 (some test suite cleanups)
 - rust-lang#136296 (float::min/max: mention the non-determinism around signed 0)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 7f05c7e into rust-lang:master Jan 31, 2025
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.86.0 milestone Jan 31, 2025
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#136150 - marcoieni:windows-25-i686-mingw, r=Kobzol

ci: use windows 2025 for i686-mingw

try-job: i686-mingw
@marcoieni marcoieni mentioned this pull request Jan 31, 2025
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants