Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove hax #22408

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 18, 2015
Merged

Remove hax #22408

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 18, 2015

Conversation

steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

Fixes #19321

... I think? make check passes, but I'm not 100% sure that there's a test for that behavior. Thoughts?

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

I know nothing of this hack. @alexcrichton do you? I'm inclined to just r+ and see what happens, I guess.

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ eeee0e8 rollup

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Hm yes I do think we take care of this use case now. At least if it doesn't bounce on the bots it works for me!

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2015
Fixes rust-lang#19321

... I think? `make check` passes, but I'm not 100% sure that there's a test for that behavior. Thoughts?
@huonw huonw merged commit eeee0e8 into rust-lang:master Feb 18, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

No longer need librustc_llvm::static_link_hack_this_sucks?
5 participants