Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use FnvHashMap in more places #35909

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Use FnvHashMap in more places #35909

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor

  • A step towards Bit-for-bit deterministic / reproducible builds #34902 (see my comments there)
  • More stable error messages in some places related to crate loading
  • Possible slight performance improvements since all HashMaps
    replaced had small keys where FnvHashMap should be faster
    (although I didn't measure)

(likewise for HashSet -> FnvHashSet)

* A step towards #34902
* More stable error messages in some places related to crate loading
* Possible slight performance improvements since all `HashMap`s
  replaced had small keys where `FnvHashMap` should be faster
  (although I didn't measure)
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @eddyb

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented Aug 22, 2016

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 22, 2016

📌 Commit c95236f has been approved by eddyb

eddyb added a commit to eddyb/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2016
Use `FnvHashMap` in more places

* A step towards rust-lang#34902 (see my comments there)
* More stable error messages in some places related to crate loading
* Possible slight performance improvements since all `HashMap`s
  replaced had small keys where `FnvHashMap` should be faster
  (although I didn't measure)

(likewise for `HashSet` -> `FnvHashSet`)
@jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing. I'll put this in a bigger PR. The queue times are insane...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants