Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stabilize field init shorthand #39761

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 16, 2017
Merged

Stabilize field init shorthand #39761

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 16, 2017

Conversation

est31
Copy link
Member

@est31 est31 commented Feb 12, 2017

Closes #37340.

Still blocked by the documentation issue #38830. EDIT: seems that all parts required for stabilisation are fixed, so its not blocked.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @arielb1

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 15, 2017

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #39633) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@aturon
Copy link
Member

aturon commented Feb 15, 2017

@bors: r+

Huzzah!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 15, 2017

📌 Commit aebd94f has been approved by aturon

frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2017
Stabilize field init shorthand

Closes rust-lang#37340.

~Still blocked by the documentation issue rust-lang#38830.~ EDIT: seems that all parts required for stabilisation are fixed, so its not blocked.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 16, 2017

⌛ Testing commit aebd94f with merge 1b6f1fe...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2017
Stabilize field init shorthand

Closes #37340.

~Still blocked by the documentation issue #38830.~ EDIT: seems that all parts required for stabilisation are fixed, so its not blocked.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 16, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: aturon
Pushing 1b6f1fe to master...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Tracking issue for RFC 1682: field init shorthand
5 participants