-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Propagate expected type hints through struct literals. #40398
Conversation
r=me pending crater. |
We discussed this in the @rust-lang/compiler meeting. It's a tough call regarding the backport. On the one hand, we definitely want to fix the bug, and it affects anybody using the Let's see what crater has to say (a clean run would help allay fears) before reaching a final decision. |
Crater report only contains false positives (network errors, I think)! |
OK, we're marking as beta-accepted. Live on the edge! cc @rust-lang/compiler |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 50aee36 has been approved by |
Looks like this was never formally r+'d? |
Propagate expected type hints through struct literals. Partial fix for rust-lang#31260 to maximize backwards-compatibility, i.e. the hint is provided but not coerced to. The added test works because `{...; x}` with a hint of `T` coerces `x` to `T`, and the reasoning why that is slightly different has to do with DSTs: `&Struct { tail: [x] }: &Struct<[T]>` has a hint of `[T]` for `[x]`, but the inferred type should be `[T; 1]` to succeed later, so `[x]` shouldn't be *forced* to be `[T]`. *However*, implementing that complete behavior in a backwards-compatible way may be non-trivial, and has not yet been fully investigated, while this PR fixes rust-lang#40355 and can be backported. r? @nikomatsakis
Propagate expected type hints through struct literals. Partial fix for rust-lang#31260 to maximize backwards-compatibility, i.e. the hint is provided but not coerced to. The added test works because `{...; x}` with a hint of `T` coerces `x` to `T`, and the reasoning why that is slightly different has to do with DSTs: `&Struct { tail: [x] }: &Struct<[T]>` has a hint of `[T]` for `[x]`, but the inferred type should be `[T; 1]` to succeed later, so `[x]` shouldn't be *forced* to be `[T]`. *However*, implementing that complete behavior in a backwards-compatible way may be non-trivial, and has not yet been fully investigated, while this PR fixes rust-lang#40355 and can be backported. r? @nikomatsakis
Propagate expected type hints through struct literals. Partial fix for rust-lang#31260 to maximize backwards-compatibility, i.e. the hint is provided but not coerced to. The added test works because `{...; x}` with a hint of `T` coerces `x` to `T`, and the reasoning why that is slightly different has to do with DSTs: `&Struct { tail: [x] }: &Struct<[T]>` has a hint of `[T]` for `[x]`, but the inferred type should be `[T; 1]` to succeed later, so `[x]` shouldn't be *forced* to be `[T]`. *However*, implementing that complete behavior in a backwards-compatible way may be non-trivial, and has not yet been fully investigated, while this PR fixes rust-lang#40355 and can be backported. r? @nikomatsakis
Propagate expected type hints through struct literals. Partial fix for rust-lang#31260 to maximize backwards-compatibility, i.e. the hint is provided but not coerced to. The added test works because `{...; x}` with a hint of `T` coerces `x` to `T`, and the reasoning why that is slightly different has to do with DSTs: `&Struct { tail: [x] }: &Struct<[T]>` has a hint of `[T]` for `[x]`, but the inferred type should be `[T; 1]` to succeed later, so `[x]` shouldn't be *forced* to be `[T]`. *However*, implementing that complete behavior in a backwards-compatible way may be non-trivial, and has not yet been fully investigated, while this PR fixes rust-lang#40355 and can be backported. r? @nikomatsakis
Propagate expected type hints through struct literals. Partial fix for rust-lang#31260 to maximize backwards-compatibility, i.e. the hint is provided but not coerced to. The added test works because `{...; x}` with a hint of `T` coerces `x` to `T`, and the reasoning why that is slightly different has to do with DSTs: `&Struct { tail: [x] }: &Struct<[T]>` has a hint of `[T]` for `[x]`, but the inferred type should be `[T; 1]` to succeed later, so `[x]` shouldn't be *forced* to be `[T]`. *However*, implementing that complete behavior in a backwards-compatible way may be non-trivial, and has not yet been fully investigated, while this PR fixes rust-lang#40355 and can be backported. r? @nikomatsakis
@nikomatsakis @brson If this made it into the stable release but wasn't merged on nightly, it might be missing from beta. I'll re-nominate it to make sure we don't forget to check (and backport if needed). |
Partial fix for #31260 to maximize backwards-compatibility, i.e. the hint is provided but not coerced to.
The added test works because
{...; x}
with a hint ofT
coercesx
toT
, and the reasoning why that is slightly different has to do with DSTs:&Struct { tail: [x] }: &Struct<[T]>
has a hint of[T]
for[x]
, but the inferred type should be[T; 1]
to succeed later, so[x]
shouldn't be forced to be[T]
.However, implementing that complete behavior in a backwards-compatible way may be non-trivial, and has not yet been fully investigated, while this PR fixes #40355 and can be backported.
r? @nikomatsakis