-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
do not fetch variance for items when equating #41913
Merged
bors
merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:master
from
nikomatsakis:issue-41849-variance-cycle
May 11, 2017
Merged
do not fetch variance for items when equating #41913
bors
merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:master
from
nikomatsakis:issue-41849-variance-cycle
May 11, 2017
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fixes rust-lang#41849. Problem was that evaluating the constant expression required evaluating a trait, which would equate types, which would request variance information, which it would then discard. However, computing the variance information would require determining the type of a field, which would evaluate the constant expression. (This problem will potentially arise *later* as we move to more sophisticated constants, however, where we need to check subtyping. We can tackle that when we come to it.)
nikomatsakis
added
beta-nominated
Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
May 11, 2017
Nominated for beta -- regression. |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit d22d1fe has been approved by |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 11, 2017
do not fetch variance for items when equating Fixes #41849. Problem was that evaluating the constant expression required evaluating a trait, which would equate types, which would request variance information, which it would then discard. However, computing the variance information would require determining the type of a field, which would evaluate the constant expression. (This problem will potentially arise *later* as we move to more sophisticated constants, however, where we need to check subtyping. We can tackle that when we come to it.) r? @eddyb
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
brson
added
the
beta-accepted
Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel.
label
May 23, 2017
Accepted for beta because I trust niko. |
Doesn't pick cleanly @nikomatsakis |
Merged
nikomatsakis
removed
the
beta-nominated
Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel.
label
May 25, 2017
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
beta-accepted
Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #41849. Problem was that evaluating the constant expression
required evaluating a trait, which would equate types, which would
request variance information, which it would then discard. However,
computing the variance information would require determining the type of
a field, which would evaluate the constant expression.
(This problem will potentially arise later as we move to more sophisticated
constants, however, where we need to check subtyping. We can tackle that
when we come to it.)
r? @eddyb