Document unintuitive argument order for Vec::dedup_by relation #43041
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @alexcrichton (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
When trying to use dedup_by to merge some auxiliary information from removed elements into kept elements, I was surprised to observe that vec.dedup_by(same_bucket) calls same_bucket(a, b) where b appears before a in the vector, and discards a when true is returned. This argument order is probably a bug, but since it has already been stabilized, I guess we should document it as a feature and move on. (Vec::dedup also uses == with this unexpected argument order, but I figure that’s not important since == is expected to be symmetric with no side effects.) Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
|
@bors: r+ |
|
📌 Commit d68c3ab has been approved by |
|
@bors rollup |
Mark-Simulacrum
added a commit
to Mark-Simulacrum/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 4, 2017
Document unintuitive argument order for Vec::dedup_by relation When trying to use `dedup_by` to merge some auxiliary information from removed elements into kept elements, I was surprised to observe that `vec.dedup_by(same_bucket)` calls `same_bucket(a, b)` where `b` appears before `a` in the vector, and discards `a` when true is returned. This argument order is probably a bug, but since it has already been stabilized, I guess we should document it as a feature and move on. (`Vec::dedup` also uses `==` with this unexpected argument order, but I figure that’s not important since `==` is expected to be symmetric with no side effects.)
Mark-Simulacrum
added a commit
to Mark-Simulacrum/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 4, 2017
Document unintuitive argument order for Vec::dedup_by relation When trying to use `dedup_by` to merge some auxiliary information from removed elements into kept elements, I was surprised to observe that `vec.dedup_by(same_bucket)` calls `same_bucket(a, b)` where `b` appears before `a` in the vector, and discards `a` when true is returned. This argument order is probably a bug, but since it has already been stabilized, I guess we should document it as a feature and move on. (`Vec::dedup` also uses `==` with this unexpected argument order, but I figure that’s not important since `==` is expected to be symmetric with no side effects.)
frewsxcv
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 4, 2017
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When trying to use
dedup_byto merge some auxiliary information from removed elements into kept elements, I was surprised to observe thatvec.dedup_by(same_bucket)callssame_bucket(a, b)wherebappears beforeain the vector, and discardsawhen true is returned. This argument order is probably a bug, but since it has already been stabilized, I guess we should document it as a feature and move on.(
Vec::dedupalso uses==with this unexpected argument order, but I figure that’s not important since==is expected to be symmetric with no side effects.)