Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Assume at least LLVM 3.9 in rustllvm and rustc_llvm #46435

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 3, 2017

Conversation

cuviper
Copy link
Member

@cuviper cuviper commented Dec 1, 2017

We bumped the minimum LLVM to 3.9 in #45326. This just cleans up the conditional code in the rustllvm C++ wrappers to assume that minimum, and similarly cleans up the rustc_llvm build script.

We bumped the minimum LLVM to 3.9 in rust-lang#45326.  This just cleans up the
conditional code in the rustllvm C++ wrappers to assume at least 3.9.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @arielb1

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@@ -96,11 +83,11 @@ fn main() {
let version_output = output(&mut version_cmd);
let mut parts = version_output.split('.').take(2)
.filter_map(|s| s.parse::<u32>().ok());
let (major, minor) =
let (major, _minor) =
if let (Some(major), Some(minor)) = (parts.next(), parts.next()) {
(major, minor)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this panic! if it encounters a version < 3.9?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We certainly could, but this is also checked in bootstrap.

@kennytm kennytm added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 2, 2017
@hanna-kruppe
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM, nice cleanup!

Supposedly I have bors access now, let's try this: @bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 2, 2017

@rkruppe: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: Not in reviewers

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 2, 2017

@rkruppe: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: and not in try users

@hanna-kruppe
Copy link
Contributor

🤔 rust-lang/rust-central-station#26 🤔

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@rkruppe oops sorry I forgot to restart rcs to load the new changes, you should be good to go now!

@bors: r=rkruppe

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 2, 2017

📌 Commit 5c4452a has been approved by rkruppe

@kennytm kennytm added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 3, 2017
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 3, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 5c4452a with merge 1956d55...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2017
Assume at least LLVM 3.9 in rustllvm and rustc_llvm

We bumped the minimum LLVM to 3.9 in #45326.  This just cleans up the conditional code in the `rustllvm` C++ wrappers to assume that minimum, and similarly cleans up the `rustc_llvm` build script.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 3, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: rkruppe
Pushing 1956d55 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 5c4452a into rust-lang:master Dec 3, 2017
@cuviper cuviper deleted the min-llvm-3.9 branch January 26, 2018 21:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants