-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Debug #48116. #48127
Debug #48116. #48127
Conversation
@bors r+ p=1 |
📌 Commit 9f015ee has been approved by |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #48113) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
@kennytm Needs rebase. |
Okay okay |
@bors r=eddyb |
📌 Commit 3337d51 has been approved by |
⌛ Testing commit 3337d51 with merge 790e7b2fcfdefa3b583b45d05b20c7de9862d5c4... |
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
Perfect, hit #48116 😂 I think we could take a look at the result before retrying.
|
Okay, looks like outer |
What I'm curious about is what in the world is nondeterministic to cause this? |
Since we've got the reason of failure, I'm transforming this PR for debugging. |
@bors try |
[WIP] Debug #48116. 1. When the invalid condition is hit, write out the relevant variables too 2. In compile-fail/parse-fail tests, check for ICE first, so the invalid error patterns won't mask our ICE output. r? @alexcrichton cc #48116, cc @eddyb
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
1. When the invalid condition is hit, write out the relevant variables too 2. In compile-fail/parse-fail tests, check for ICE first, so the invalid error patterns won't mask our ICE output.
d2ca440
to
7c54f2a
Compare
(Needs to test the magic power of the @bors r+ p=52 |
📌 Commit 4f95269 has been approved by |
⌛ Testing commit 4f95269 with merge 3ca6eed5832800d513ead5f11927ed1a4f7bf2ef... |
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
cancelbot is too aggressive, there should be some way to let cancelbot ignore manual restarts... 😐 |
Try to fix 48116 and 48192 The bug #48116 happens because of a misoptimization of the `import_path_to_string` function, where a `names` slice is empty but the `!names.is_empty()` branch is executed. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/4d2d3fc5dadf894a8ad709a5860a549f2c0b1032/src/librustc_resolve/resolve_imports.rs#L1015-L1042 Yesterday, @eddyb had locally reproduced the bug, and [came across the `position` function](https://mozilla.logbot.info/rust-infra/20180214#c14296834) where the `assume()` call is found to be suspicious. We have *not* concluded that this `assume()` causes #48116, but given [the reputation of `assume()`](#45501 (comment)), this seems higher relevant. Here we try to see if commenting it out can fix the errors. Later @alexcrichton has bisected and found a potential bug [in the LLVM side](#48116 (comment)). We are currently testing if reverting that LLVM commit is enough to stop the bug. If true, this PR can be reverted (keep the `assume()`) and we could backport the LLVM patch instead. (This PR also includes an earlier commit from #48127 for help debugging ICE happening in compile-fail/parse-fail tests.) The PR also reverts #48059, which seems to cause #48192. r? @alexcrichton cc @eddyb, @arthurprs (#47333)
r? @alexcrichton
cc #48116, cc @eddyb