Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Abort if a promoted fails to be const evaluable and its runtime checks didn't trigger #52571

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 23, 2018
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
11 changes: 8 additions & 3 deletions src/librustc_codegen_llvm/mir/operand.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ use rustc_data_structures::indexed_vec::Idx;
use rustc_data_structures::sync::Lrc;

use base;
use common::{CodegenCx, C_null, C_undef, C_usize};
use common::{CodegenCx, C_undef, C_usize};
use builder::{Builder, MemFlags};
use value::Value;
use type_of::LayoutLlvmExt;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -411,7 +411,10 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FunctionCx<'a, 'tcx> {
.unwrap_or_else(|err| {
match constant.literal {
mir::Literal::Promoted { .. } => {
// FIXME: generate a panic here
// this is unreachable as long as runtime
// and compile-time agree on values
// With floats that won't always be true
// so we generate an abort below
},
mir::Literal::Value { .. } => {
err.report_as_error(
Expand All @@ -420,10 +423,12 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FunctionCx<'a, 'tcx> {
);
},
}
let fnname = bx.cx.get_intrinsic(&("llvm.trap"));
bx.call(fnname, &[], None);
// We've errored, so we don't have to produce working code.
let layout = bx.cx.layout_of(ty);
PlaceRef::new_sized(
C_null(layout.llvm_type(bx.cx).ptr_to()),
C_undef(layout.llvm_type(bx.cx).ptr_to()),
layout,
layout.align,
).load(bx)
Expand Down
37 changes: 37 additions & 0 deletions src/test/run-pass/invalid_const_promotion.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
// Copyright 2018 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
// except according to those terms.

// ignore-wasm
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry it should be // ignore-wasm32 😭 (or maybe // ignore-emscripten to include asm.js too, I'm not sure if asm.js can run a program)


#![feature(const_fn)]
#![allow(const_err)]

use std::env;
use std::process::{Command, Stdio};

const fn bar() -> usize { 0 - 1 }

fn foo() {
let _: &'static _ = &bar();
}

fn main() {
let args: Vec<String> = env::args().collect();
if args.len() > 1 && args[1] == "test" {
foo();
return;
}

let mut p = Command::new(&args[0])
.stdout(Stdio::piped())
.stdin(Stdio::piped())
.arg("test").output().unwrap();
assert!(!p.status.success());
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test would also pass if the program SEGFAULTs (like some variants of this did) instead of SIGILLs... but I am not sure how to test for this properly, so whatever.^^

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#[cfg(unix)]
fn check_status(status: std::process::ExitStatus)
{
use libc;
use std::os::unix::process::ExitStatusExt;
assert!(status.signal() == Some(libc::SIGSEGV)
|| status.signal() == Some(libc::SIGBUS));
}
#[cfg(not(unix))]
fn check_status(status: std::process::ExitStatus)
{
assert!(!status.success());
}

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So...? That's how this test could be improved, is what you are saying?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I mean we already have copy-pastable code that does the exact checking necessary here. We should avoid writing non-trivial tests by hand when there's already a good example.

}