Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Attach deprecation lint proc_macro_derive_resolution_fallback to a specific node id #52589

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 23, 2018

Conversation

petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@petrochenkov petrochenkov commented Jul 21, 2018

So it can be allow-ed from inside the derive.

cc #51952

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @estebank

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 21, 2018
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

r? @alexcrichton

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

Thanks for adding this!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 21, 2018

📌 Commit 79b5ebf has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 21, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 23, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 79b5ebf with merge 655258e437c8489e14a226a9e85e373a51ba48cb...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 23, 2018

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jul 23, 2018
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-gnu-aux of your PR failed on Travis (raw log). Through arcane magic we have determined that the following fragments from the build log may contain information about the problem.

Click to expand the log.
[01:29:22] [TIMING] ToolBuild { compiler: Compiler { stage: 0, host: "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" }, target: "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu", tool: "cargotest", path: "src/tools/cargotest", mode: ToolBootstrap, is_ext_tool: false, extra_features: [] } -- 1.340
[01:29:22] testing https://github.com/servo/webrender
[01:29:22] Initialized empty Git repository in /checkout/obj/build/ct/webrender/.git/
[01:29:22] fatal: Could not parse object '57250b2b8fa63934f80e5376a29f7dcb3f759ad6'.
[01:30:18] fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/servo/webrender/': Could not resolve host: github.com
[01:30:18] thread 'main' panicked at 'assertion failed: status.success()', tools/cargotest/main.rs:128:13
[01:30:18] 
[01:30:18] 
[01:30:18] command did not execute successfully: "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-tools-bin/cargotest" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo" "/checkout/obj/build/ct"
[01:30:18] expected success, got: exit code: 101
[01:30:18] expected success, got: exit code: 101
[01:30:18] 
[01:30:18] 
[01:30:18] failed to run: /checkout/obj/build/bootstrap/debug/bootstrap test src/test/pretty src/test/run-pass/pretty src/test/run-fail/pretty src/test/run-pass-valgrind/pretty src/test/run-pass-fulldeps/pretty src/test/run-fail-fulldeps/pretty src/tools/cargo src/tools/cargotest
[01:30:18] Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:34:46
[01:30:18] make: *** [check-aux] Error 1
[01:30:18] Makefile:60: recipe for target 'check-aux' failed

The command "stamp sh -x -c "$RUN_SCRIPT"" exited with 2.
travis_time:start:03853e17
$ date && (curl -fs --head https://google.com | grep ^Date: | sed 's/Date: //g' || true)
---
travis_time:end:0bce3218:start=1532328162167774924,finish=1532328162173304589,duration=5529665
travis_fold:end:after_failure.3
travis_fold:start:after_failure.4
travis_time:start:046d2910
$ ln -s . checkout && for CORE in obj/cores/core.*; do EXE=$(echo $CORE | sed 's|obj/cores/core\.[0-9]*\.!checkout!\(.*\)|\1|;y|!|/|'); if [ -f "$EXE" ]; then printf travis_fold":start:crashlog\n\033[31;1m%s\033[0m\n" "$CORE"; gdb -q -c "$CORE" "$EXE" -iex 'set auto-load off' -iex 'dir src/' -iex 'set sysroot .' -ex bt -ex q; echo travis_fold":"end:crashlog; fi; done || true
travis_fold:end:after_failure.4
travis_fold:start:after_failure.5
travis_time:start:0c72f26a
travis_time:start:0c72f26a
$ cat ./obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/native/asan/build/lib/asan/clang_rt.asan-dynamic-i386.vers || true
cat: ./obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/native/asan/build/lib/asan/clang_rt.asan-dynamic-i386.vers: No such file or directory
travis_fold:end:after_failure.5
travis_fold:start:after_failure.6
travis_time:start:2eefd9ee
$ dmesg | grep -i kill

I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact @TimNN. (Feature Requests)

@kennytm
Copy link
Member

kennytm commented Jul 23, 2018

@bors retry travis-ci/travis-ci#9696

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 23, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 23, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 79b5ebf with merge 970102f...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2018
Attach deprecation lint `proc_macro_derive_resolution_fallback` to a specific node id

So it can be `allow`-ed from inside the derive.

cc #51952
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 23, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing 970102f to master...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants