Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow assignments in const contexts #56070
Allow assignments in const contexts #56070
Changes from 6 commits
bc543d7
59eff14
7d5b5ff
f98235e
6bcb0d6
f70abe8
7d96f2c
3e081c7
37fcd5c
301ce8b
3c290a5
42a3f73
e05b61c
22aebd5
6db8c6c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Continuing with
Projections would include
Deref
, which isn't a problem because we can't have mutable references at all inside const contexts. Still something to think about.Downcast
also can't happen, because we'd needmatch
for that.Maybe we should just whitelist field projections for now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The problem is something like this:
I suspect that will actually compile with this PR, although I'd like a confirmation.
We could add this as a testcase, but you might be able to come up with something simpler/more general.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This indeed compiles successfully with this PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My suggestion is field (or projections in general) assignment should combine qualifications (i.e.
|=
) instead of replacing them.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I now reuse the existing projection checks for reading values. These checks replace the qualification with
NOT_CONST
, so there's no real use in combining I think?