Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dbg macro: align line number to 4 digits #58753

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

hellow554
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #58647

I think this is worth getting some more people into this discussion. Thankfully according to the doc

The exact output printed by this macro should not be relied upon and is subject to future changes.

So nobody can complain ;)

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @KodrAus

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 26, 2019
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-gnu-llvm-6.0 of your PR failed on Travis (raw log). Through arcane magic we have determined that the following fragments from the build log may contain information about the problem.

Click to expand the log.
travis_time:end:0a024548:start=1551180202029543386,finish=1551180203226046097,duration=1196502711
$ git checkout -qf FETCH_HEAD
travis_fold:end:git.checkout

Encrypted environment variables have been removed for security reasons.
See https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/pull-requests/#pull-requests-and-security-restrictions
$ export SCCACHE_BUCKET=rust-lang-ci-sccache2
$ export SCCACHE_REGION=us-west-1
Setting environment variables from .travis.yml
$ export IMAGE=x86_64-gnu-llvm-6.0
---
[01:02:27] .................................................................................................... 4300/5417
[01:02:30] .................................................................................................... 4400/5417
[01:02:33] .................................................................................................... 4500/5417
[01:02:37] ...............................................................i.................................... 4600/5417
[01:02:43] ....................................F............................................................... 4700/5417
[01:02:49] .................................................................................................... 4900/5417
[01:02:53] .................................................................................................... 5000/5417
[01:02:56] .................................................................................................... 5100/5417
[01:02:59] .................................................................................................... 5200/5417
---
[01:03:05] ------------------------------------------
[01:03:05] stderr:
[01:03:05] ------------------------------------------
[01:03:05] thread 'main' panicked at 'assertion failed: `(left == right)`
[01:03:05]   left: `[":0021] Unit = Unit", ":0022] a = Unit", ":0028] Point{x: 42, y: 24,} = Point {", "    x: 42,", "    y: 24", "}", ":0029] b = Point {", "    x: 42,", "    y: 24", "}", ":0038] &a = NoCopy(", "    1337", ")", ":0038] dbg!(& a) = NoCopy(", "    1337", ")", ":0043] f(&42) = 42", "before", ":0048] { foo += 1; eprintln!(\"before\"); 7331 } = 7331"]`,
[01:03:05]  right: `[":21] Unit = Unit", ":22] a = Unit", ":28] Point{x: 42, y: 24,} = Point {", "    x: 42,", "    y: 24", "}", ":29] b = Point {", "    x: 42,", "    y: 24", "}", ":38] &a = NoCopy(", "    1337", ")", ":38] dbg!(& a) = NoCopy(", "    1337", ")", ":43] f(&42) = 42", "before", ":48] { foo += 1; eprintln!(\"before\"); 7331 } = 7331"]`', /checkout/src/test/ui/rfc-2361-dbg-macro/dbg-macro-expected-behavior.rs:57:5
[01:03:05] 
[01:03:05] ------------------------------------------
[01:03:05] 
[01:03:05] thread '[ui] ui/rfc-2361-dbg-macro/dbg-macro-expected-behavior.rs' panicked at 'explicit panic', src/tools/compiletest/src/runtest.rs:3295:9
---
[01:03:05] 
[01:03:05] thread 'main' panicked at 'Some tests failed', src/tools/compiletest/src/main.rs:496:22
[01:03:05] 
[01:03:05] 
[01:03:05] command did not execute successfully: "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-tools-bin/compiletest" "--compile-lib-path" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/lib" "--run-lib-path" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib" "--rustc-path" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/bin/rustc" "--src-base" "/checkout/src/test/ui" "--build-base" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui" "--stage-id" "stage2-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--mode" "ui" "--target" "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--host" "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--llvm-filecheck" "/usr/lib/llvm-6.0/bin/FileCheck" "--host-rustcflags" "-Crpath -O -Zunstable-options  -Lnative=/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/native/rust-test-helpers" "--target-rustcflags" "-Crpath -O -Zunstable-options  -Lnative=/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/native/rust-test-helpers" "--docck-python" "/usr/bin/python2.7" "--lldb-python" "/usr/bin/python2.7" "--gdb" "/usr/bin/gdb" "--quiet" "--llvm-version" "6.0.0\n" "--system-llvm" "--cc" "" "--cxx" "" "--cflags" "" "--llvm-components" "" "--llvm-cxxflags" "" "--adb-path" "adb" "--adb-test-dir" "/data/tmp/work" "--android-cross-path" "" "--color" "always"
[01:03:05] 
[01:03:05] 
[01:03:05] failed to run: /checkout/obj/build/bootstrap/debug/bootstrap test
[01:03:05] Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:03:57
[01:03:05] Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:03:57
[01:03:05] Makefile:48: recipe for target 'check' failed
[01:03:05] make: *** [check] Error 1
The command "stamp sh -x -c "$RUN_SCRIPT"" exited with 2.
travis_time:start:044f8936
$ date && (curl -fs --head https://google.com | grep ^Date: | sed 's/Date: //g' || true)
Tue Feb 26 12:26:38 UTC 2019
---
travis_time:end:046af428:start=1551183999860482742,finish=1551183999865007854,duration=4525112
travis_fold:end:after_failure.3
travis_fold:start:after_failure.4
travis_time:start:01933224
$ ln -s . checkout && for CORE in obj/cores/core.*; do EXE=$(echo $CORE | sed 's|obj/cores/core\.[0-9]*\.!checkout!\(.*\)|\1|;y|!|/|'); if [ -f "$EXE" ]; then printf travis_fold":start:crashlog\n\033[31;1m%s\033[0m\n" "$CORE"; gdb --batch -q -c "$CORE" "$EXE" -iex 'set auto-load off' -iex 'dir src/' -iex 'set sysroot .' -ex bt -ex q; echo travis_fold":"end:crashlog; fi; done || true
travis_fold:end:after_failure.4
travis_fold:start:after_failure.5
travis_time:start:0361d15a
travis_time:start:0361d15a
$ cat ./obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/native/asan/build/lib/asan/clang_rt.asan-dynamic-i386.vers || true
cat: ./obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/native/asan/build/lib/asan/clang_rt.asan-dynamic-i386.vers: No such file or directory
travis_fold:end:after_failure.5
travis_fold:start:after_failure.6
travis_time:start:143d35f8
$ dmesg | grep -i kill

I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact @TimNN. (Feature Requests)

@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Feb 26, 2019

As I said on the issue, I am not sure that the common case would benefit from this change so I'm therefore not sure this is an improvement.

@Dylan-DPC-zz
Copy link

ping from triage @Centril any updates on this? i'm assuming we can close this?

@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Mar 18, 2019

@Dylan-DPC I'm not the reviewer; r? @alexcrichton

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the PR @hellow554, and sorry for the delay!

You're definitely right that I think we can change the output here at any time, so I think we're safe to do that. Given that this is a macro for debugging I think aligning the output seems reasonable to me in spirit, although for the actual formatting I might recommend something different.

With a leading 0 numbers (because of the C language) can often be interpreted as octal, and I'm not sure I've ever seen a zero-padded line number before. I also might recommend against right-aligning the number because a lot of editors special case file:line as a clickable link, so file: line may fool them by accident. Perhaps though we could do something like:

[some/main.rs:84  ] hex::encode(dst.as_ref()) = "686aca464489"
[some/main.rs:126 ] hex::encode(src.as_ref()) = "f8c91afe015f"

which I believe would still solve the issue?

Note though that this could be pretty confusing for programs that are always under a hundred lines or so. You'd always have a few spaces at the end and you may not know what they're used for. Additionally the filenames can change between modules, so this may also make it hard to align output across multiple modules.

All-in-all I'm not entirely sure whether this ends up being worth it after digging into the details. While it's a mild cosmetic improvement it seems like a sort of niche one that brings a number of downsides with it which may not outweigh the benefit.

@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Mar 18, 2019

Perhaps though we could do something like:

[some/main.rs:84  ] hex::encode(dst.as_ref()) = "686aca464489"
[some/main.rs:126 ] hex::encode(src.as_ref()) = "f8c91afe015f"

which I believe would still solve the issue?

That feels rather "empty" for lack of a better term.

Note though that this could be pretty confusing for programs that are always under a hundred lines or so. You'd always have a few spaces at the end and you may not know what they're used for. Additionally the filenames can change between modules, so this may also make it hard to align output across multiple modules.

Yep; I think we should also consider smaller modules. That feels like something to encourage. I think most modules should be sized between 100-999 so that aligns well for those. Aligning for 4 digits feels like encouraging the wrong thing.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

My point isn't so much the number of lines in a module itself but the difference between the filename length of src/lib.rs and src/main.rs, and how the dbg! macro doesn't attempt (and I don't think it should attempt) to cope with those differences and align everything.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 19, 2019

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #59293) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Mar 30, 2019

@alexcrichton Sure; I think yours is a good point as well ;) -- any thoughts on what to do here (...and ping from triage...)?

@hellow554
Copy link
Contributor Author

Somehow this PR slipped through my notification center...
Thanks alex for your words and I see what you mean. So I think I should just close this PR and therefore close the related issue?

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Sounds good to me!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants